Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03678532
Other study ID # sedation in COPD
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 1, 2016
Est. completion date December 1, 2017

Study information

Verified date September 2018
Source Assiut University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

the investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial in respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Assiut University Hospital. COPD patients admitted to RICU were included. Exclusion criteria include: Marked renal impairment, Liver cell failure, neurological disorders, age <18 or >70 and pregnancy.

Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Midazolam was used for sedation in both groups. Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS) was used to monitor level of sedation or agitation. Control group received daily interruption of sedation. intervention group managed by no-sedation strategy.

Primary outcome measure: changes in PaCO2 Secondary outcome measures include: changes in PH, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, P0.1 and NIF.


Description:

The researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial in respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Assiut University Hospital. COPD patients admitted to RICU were included. Exclusion Criteria include: Marked renal impairment (creatinine > 2mg/dl), Liver cell failure (Bilirubin> 3mg/dl), neurological disorders, age <18 or >70 and pregnancy.

Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Midazolam was used for sedation in both groups. Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS) was used to monitor level of sedation or agitation. Control group received daily interruption of sedation. After intubation, patients received IV infusion of midazolam, gradually increasing dose till RASS reached -4 or -5. Infusion stopped at 7:00 AM. If the patient is awake no need for resuming infusion. If signs of discomfort occurred, infusion resumed at half of the prior dose, targeting conscious sedation (RASS 0: -3) Intervention group were managed by no-sedation strategy. Patients received bolus doses of midazolam only when needed, after atrial to control agitation by correcting the underlying cause. If the patient needed more than 3 bolus doses , IV infusion of midazolam was given by the daily interruption protocol as in the control group. No crossover was allowed between groups. Analysis was done by intension-to-treat principle.

Follow up arterial blood gas sampling was done baseline at intubation. 1hr., 2hrs., 12hrs., 24hrs. and 48hrs. after intubation. Recording of clinical monitoring parameters (hear rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate) was done at the same intervals. Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) and negative inspiratory force (NIF) were measured 48 hours after intubation to test affection of respiratory muscles in both groups.

Primary outcome measure: changes in PaCO2 Secondary outcome measures include: changes in PH, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, P0.1 and NIF.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 97
Est. completion date December 1, 2017
Est. primary completion date November 1, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Critically ill patients diagnosed as COPD, admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Assiut University Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

Marked renal impairment (creatinine > 2mg/dl), Liver cell failure (Bilirubin> 3mg/dl), neurological disorders, age <18 or >70 and pregnancy.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Midazolam


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assiut University

References & Publications (4)

Kress JP, Vinayak AG, Levitt J, Schweickert WD, Gehlbach BK, Zimmerman F, Pohlman AS, Hall JB. Daily sedative interruption in mechanically ventilated patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):365-71. — View Citation

Laerkner E, Stroem T, Toft P. No-sedation during mechanical ventilation: impact on patient's consciousness, nursing workload and costs. Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Jan;21(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12161. Epub 2015 Apr 17. — View Citation

Strøm T, Toft P. Sedation and analgesia in mechanical ventilation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;35(4):441-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382156. Epub 2014 Aug 11. — View Citation

Toft P, Olsen HT, Jørgensen HK, Strøm T, Nibro HL, Oxlund J, Wian KA, Ytrebø LM, Kroken BA, Chew M. Non-sedation versus sedation with a daily wake-up trial in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (NONSEDA Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:499. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-499. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary ventilation affection changes in PaCO2 measured in mmHG 48 hours
Secondary effect of sedation on acid base status changes in PH 48 hours
Secondary Effect of sedation on heart rate heart rate beat per minute changes 48 hours
Secondary Effect of sedation on blood pressure including mean arterial blood pressure in mmHg 48 hours