Validation of Gait Speed Device Against Existing Techniques Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of the Gaitbox, SprintSystem Device and NIH Toolbox 4 Meter Walk
| Verified date | March 2018 |
| Source | Duke University |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to validate the walking velocity measured by the Gaitbox as compared to the measures obtained by clinicians administering the timed 4 meter walk test and the Sprint System device. The investigators have developed a compact device, the Gaitbox, which measures walking speed automatically. The device has an infrared light sensor that is capable to accurate distance measurements. To take a speed measurement, the device is placed at the end of the walking path and the subject simply walks towards the device. The device automatically records a starting and ending distance and calculates and displays walking speed in m/sec. This is a prospective, single site study. Up to 60 subjects will be enrolled at Duke. Subjects will be asked to complete the 4-meter walk test, three (3) times. Three speed measuring methods will be conducted simultaneously: NIH toolbox 4 meter clinic walk test and the Sprint System device (commercially available device typically used for timing track and field events), and the Gaitbox. The purpose is to validate the Gaitbox to the clinical NIH toolbox 4 meter test and against the Sprint System device. The following comparisons of speed will be made: Human timer 1 to human timer 2, Average human timer to Gaitbox, Gaitbox to Sprint System.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 35 |
| Est. completion date | March 14, 2018 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 14, 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 55 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male and female subjects aged 55 or older - Subjects must be able to complete three 5 meter walks, with or without assistive device such as canes, crutches or walkers. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects with a physical, cognitive, or behavioral impairment that would prevent the safe completion of the testing, or affect the ability to follow study directions will be excluded from participation. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Duke University | Durham | North Carolina |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Duke University | National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research |
United States,
Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Apr;55(4):M221-31. — View Citation
Hardy SE, Perera S, Roumani YF, Chandler JM, Studenski SA. Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1727-34. Epub 2007 Oct 3. — View Citation
Lusardi, Michelle M. (2012). "Is Walking Speed a Vital Sign? Absolutely." Topics in geriatric rehabilitation 28(2): 67-76.
Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, Brach J, Chandler J, Cawthon P, Connor EB, Nevitt M, Visser M, Kritchevsky S, Badinelli S, Harris T, Newman AB, Cauley J, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Time of 4 meter walk test | Up to 1 hour | ||
| Primary | Speed of 4 meter walk test | Up to 1 hour |