Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03134287
Other study ID # IndonesiaUAnes013
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received April 26, 2017
Last updated August 15, 2017
Start date February 1, 2017
Est. completion date May 31, 2017

Study information

Verified date August 2017
Source Indonesia University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study aimed to compare the efficacy between nasogastric tube placement using Two-Finger Method and Reverse Sellick's Maneuver


Description:

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups (Two-Finger method group and Reverse Sellick's maneuver group). Intravenous (IV) cannula with isotonic fluid, non-invasive blood pressure monitor, and pulse-oxymetry were set on the subjects in the operation room. Vital signs were recorded. Midazolam 1-2 mg and Fentanyl 2 µg/kg body weight (BW) were given as premedication. Induction was performed using propofol 2-3 µg/kg BW. Rocuronium 0.5mg/kg BW was also given after induction. Two minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane and 6 liter per minute of oxygen were also given using face mask for 3 minutes until the drugs took effect. Patient were then intubated. Evaluation of airway was performed to exclude the subjects who experienced airway trauma. Estimating the length of nasogastric tube was performed by stretching the nasogastric tube from xyphoid process through nose to the back of the ear. The measured number in cm then added with 15 cm and marked with tape. Nasogastric tube and the selected nostril then covered in gel sufficiently. The Two-Finger method group was placed with nasogastric tube using two-finger method, before the procedure, the endotracheal tube cuff was deflated first. And then the nasogastric tube was inserted into the selected nostril perpendicularly using dominant hand. The non-dominant hand (index and middle finger) was inserted to the base of oropharynx until the nasogastric tube was felt , and the the nasogastric tube was fixated in the middle position and the base of pharynx, as nearest as possible from esophagus, while the dominant hand pushed the nasogastric tube until it reached the mark. The reverse Sellick's maneuver group's endotracheal tube was also deflated before the procedure. The nasogastric tube was inserted into the selected nostril perpendicularly using dominant hand and pushed gently until it reached the first resistance in nasopharynx. Reverse Sellick's maneuver was performed using non-dominant hand, done by grabbing thyroid cartilage upward and elevated the larynx anteriorly, while the dominant hand kept pushing the nasogastric tube gently until it reached the mark. Evaluation whether or not the nasogastric tube was properly placed was using the auscultation method in the epigastric region and inserting air through catheter tip. Time and complications occurred during procedure were recorded. And the nasogastric tube was fixated if it was successfully inserted.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 210
Est. completion date May 31, 2017
Est. primary completion date May 1, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients aged 18-60 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-III who were planned to undergo any elective surgery at operating room in general anesthesia and needed nasogastric tube placement

- subjects had been explained about the study, and agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subjects with possibility of difficult airway

- multiple fracture in the head

- craniofacial, airway, esophagus, and neck abnormality

Drop out Criteria:

- Subjects who experience airway trauma during intubation or allergic reaction due to drugs used

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Adult Patient Undergoing Elective Surgery With General Anesthesia and Needs Nasogastric Tube Placement

Intervention

Procedure:
two-finger method, reverse sellick's method
Subjects received nasogastric tube placement by two-finger method; Subjects received nasogastric tube placement by reverse sellick's method

Locations

Country Name City State
Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital Jakarta DKI Jakarta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Indonesia University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Indonesia, 

References & Publications (12)

Agarwal A, Gaur A, Sahu D, Singh PK, Pandey CK. Nasogastric tube knotting over the epiglottis: a cause of respiratory distress. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1659-60, table of contents. — View Citation

Appukutty J, Shroff PP. Nasogastric tube insertion using different techniques in anesthetized patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):832-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af5e1f. — View Citation

Cataldi-Betcher EL, Seltzer MH, Slocum BA, Jones KW. Complications occurring during enteral nutrition support: a prospective study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1983 Nov-Dec;7(6):546-52. — View Citation

Chun DH, Kim NY, Shin YS, Kim SH. A randomized, clinical trial of frozen versus standard nasogastric tube placement. World J Surg. 2009 Sep;33(9):1789-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0144-x. — View Citation

Kirtania J, Ghose T, Garai D, Ray S. Esophageal guidewire-assisted nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):343-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823be0a4. Epub 2011 Nov 21. — View Citation

Mahajan R, Gupta R, Sharma A. Role of neck flexion in facilitating nasogastric tube insertion. Anesthesiology. 2005 Aug;103(2):446-7. — View Citation

Moharari RS, Fallah AH, Khajavi MR, Khashayar P, Lakeh MM, Najafi A. The GlideScope facilitates nasogastric tube insertion: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):115-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181be0e43. Epub 2009 Oct 27. — View Citation

Noguchi T, Shiga Y, Koga K, Shigematsu A. A method to improve a gas leak on mask ventilation in the patient with a nasogastric tube. Anesthesiology. 2001 Mar;94(3):545. — View Citation

Ozer S, Benumof JL. Oro- and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients: fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):137-43. — View Citation

Perel A, Ya'ari Y, Pizov R. Forward displacement of the larynx for nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patients. Crit Care Med. 1985 Mar;13(3):204-5. — View Citation

Ratzlaff HC, Heaslip JE, Rothwell ES. Factors affecting nasogastric tube insertion. Crit Care Med. 1984 Jan;12(1):52-3. — View Citation

Sinha PK, Koshy T. Reverse Sellick's maneuver for transesophageal echocardiographic probe placement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Aug;21(4):626-8. Epub 2007 Jan 9. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Successful rate Successful rate on nasogastric tube placement in first attempt Day 1
Secondary Time Time needed to insert the nasogastric tube Day 1
Secondary Complications Complications occurred during procedure Day 1