Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Groups of study:

120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.

Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.

Methodology:

All patients were subjected to the following:

(i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .

(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .

A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.

The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.

The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.

The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.


Clinical Trial Description

Groups of study:

120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.

Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.

Methods of randomization:

To insure that everyone had an equal chance of participation, randomization was guided by table of random numbers using computer generated system(SPSS: windous version8) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) double blinding technique was used thus; the investigator and the patient didn't know the group to which the patient was allocated.

Methodology:

All patients were subjected to the following:

(i) Complete history taking:

- Full history taking.

- Obstetric history.

- Menstrual history.

- Medical history. Data were collected in a special form for each patient. (ii) Proper counseling: Proper counseling of each patient about different types of IUDs, the advantage and side effects of each type, explanation of the menstrual pattern changes, assuring the patient that these changes are very common and that it will disappear after a period of time after insertion.

(iii) Consent: Informed consent is taken from each patients . (iv) Examination:

1. General examination.

2. Abdominal examination.

3. Pelvic examination to exclude pelvic pathology .

(v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo ( stugeron®, Mina Pharm. under licence Janssen Pharmaceutica, Egypt ) were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .

(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .

A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.

The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.

The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.

The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.

Post insertion instructions:

Palpation of strings should be performed monthly by the patient to verify continuing presence of the IUD after each menstrual flow. Caution the patient that the first 2 menses are typically heavier. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Contraceptive Device; Complications

NCT number NCT03081442
Study type Interventional
Source Cairo University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date April 11, 2017
Completion date November 1, 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03438682 - Real World Effectiveness and Safety of Hysteroscopic (Essure®) Compared to Laparoscopic Sterilization
Completed NCT03281564 - Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Removal of Essure®
Not yet recruiting NCT06355713 - Improvement of Symptoms After Removal of the Essure® Contraceptive Implant N/A
Recruiting NCT06000423 - Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Contraceptive-related Bleeding Side Effects Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06203080 - The Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety of an Intravaginal Acetic Acid Thermoreversible Gel on Chinese Women. Phase 2
Completed NCT03623126 - Impact of ESSURE Devices Withdrawal on the Symptomatology of Patients