Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02979964
Other study ID # 2016-0122-E
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 6, 2016
Est. completion date July 2018

Study information

Verified date October 2018
Source Women's College Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Health Quality Ontario (HQO) is the provincial advisor on quality in health care. HQO currently conducts audit and feedback as a key quality improvement strategy. For example, it offers physicians working in long-term care homes with access to practice reports detailing rates of high-risk prescribing in comparison with others in Ontario and suggested change ideas. Research shows that providing this kind of feedback can lead to improvements in care. However, the size of these improvements depends how the feedback is presented. For instance, prior research suggests that how the results are 'framed' and what sort of benchmark the recipient is compared to may each affect how the physician will respond. This factorial trial tests each of these aspects of feedback design in the context of practice reports that nursing home physicians have already signed up to receive quarterly.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 285
Est. completion date July 2018
Est. primary completion date October 6, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- a physician licensed by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO);

- practice in at least one LTC facility in Ontario;.

- have voluntarily signed up to receive an HQO practice report

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • High-risk Prescribing in Nursing Homes

Intervention

Behavioral:
Audit and Feedback


Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Women's College Hospital Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Women's College Hospital Health Quality Ontario

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (10)

Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Costiniuk C, Blank D, Schünemann H. Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD006777. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2. Review. — View Citation

Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37. — View Citation

Gould NJ, Lorencatto F, Stanworth SJ, Michie S, Prior ME, Glidewell L, Grimshaw JM, Francis JJ. Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocol. Implement Sci. 2014 Jul 29;9:92. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0092-1. — View Citation

Hibbard JH, Peters E, Slovic P, Finucane ML, Tusler M. Making health care quality reports easier to use. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Nov;27(11):591-604. — View Citation

Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3. Review. — View Citation

Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis JJ, Grimshaw JM. No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 17;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14. — View Citation

Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, Person SD, Weaver MT, Weissman NW. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2871-9. — View Citation

Kluger AN, Van Dijk D. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ. 2010 Dec;44(12):1166-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03849.x. Review. — View Citation

Li AC, Kannry JL, Kushniruk A, Chrimes D, McGinn TG, Edonyabo D, Mann DM. Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27. — View Citation

Weissman NW, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Farmer RM, Weaver MT, Williams OD, Child IG, Pemberton JH, Brown KC, Baker CS. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Aug;5(3):269-81. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary CNS-active medication prescribing monthly number of CNS-active medications per resident (antipsychotics, opioids, benzodiazepines or antidepressants (including TCAs and trazodone)) 6 months
Secondary Benzodiazepine (or z-drug) prescribing days supplied (continuous) 6 months
Secondary Benzodiazepine (or z-drug) rates monthly proportion 6 months
Secondary Antipsychotic rates monthly proportion 6 months
Secondary Antipsychotic prescribing days supplied (continuous) 6 months
Secondary Mean Antipsychotic dose Dose equivalent of antipsychotic dispensed (continuous) 6 months
Secondary Mean Benzodiazepine dose Dose equivalent of benzodiazepine dispensed (continuous) 6 months
Secondary 3+ CNS-active medications monthly proportion supplied three or more meds from the following classes: antipsychotics, opioids, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants (including TCAs and trazodone). 6 months
Secondary Anti-depressant prescribing days supplied (continuous) - balance measure 6 months
Secondary Anti-acid prescribing days supplied (continuous) - tracer outcome 6 months
Secondary Statin prescribing days supplied (continuous) - tracer outcome 6 months