Segmental Dysfunction of the Pelvic Region Clinical Trial
— iballOfficial title:
Use of Iball Mobile Health Technology in Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in the Postpartum Period: a Pilot Mixed Methods Study
| Verified date | August 2018 |
| Source | McMaster University |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
he postpartum period is vulnerable to dysfunction of the pelvic floor musculature, which is associated with incontinence, pain, reduced stability of the core and functional deficits. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommends instruction on the correct performance of pelvic floor muscle exercises, commonly known as Kegels, as standard care. However, only a small proportion of women seek medical care for incontinence in Canada. Recently, there has been an influx of mobile Health technology applications marketed for pelvic floor restoration and fitness that have not been studied. The existence of mHealth technologies may represent an innovative mode to support pelvic health, however systematic exploration to substantiate claims and proposed benefit is required. This pilot study aims to understand the utility of a new mobile health application, iball, as a rehabilitation tool to promote optimal pelvic floor function and to correct pregnancy related pelvic floor dysfunction. The iball is comprised of a device and a mobile app, and it has been brought to market in Europe as a consumer product. The study aims to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the iball as a pelvic floor muscle training intervention, in comparison to standard care.
| Status | Withdrawn |
| Enrollment | 0 |
| Est. completion date | July 1, 2018 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 1, 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | Female |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Women in their third trimester, first pregnancy. Exclusion Criteria: - Currently seeing a pelvic health physiotherapists or participating in a pelvic floor fitness program. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| McMaster University |
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Acceptability of the iball intervention (via qualitative data collection) | Tell me about your experiences using the iball device? What aspects of iball were the most useful or helpful? Which aspects of iball were least useful or helpful? Are there any changes you would make to the iball device or app? If you had to explain iball to friend, what would you say? Would you recommend it to a friend - why or why not? Do you plan on continuing to use iball at this time? Why or why not? Would you consider using iball again in the future? |
16 weeks | |
| Secondary | PERFECT - pelvic floor exam scores | 16 weeks | ||
| Secondary | Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) | Standardized outcome measure | 16 weeks | |
| Secondary | Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) | Standardized outcome measure | 16 weeks |