Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) Clinical Trial
Official title:
A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 2 STUDY OF PALBOCICLIB PLUS CETUXIMAB VERSUS CETUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS-NEGATIVE, CETUXIMAB-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT/METASTATIC SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK AFTER FAILURE OF ONE PRIOR PLATINUM-CONTAINING CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMEN
Verified date | August 2023 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the combination of palbociclib with cetuximab is superior to cetuximab in prolonging overall survival in HPV-negative, cetuximab-naive patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 125 |
Est. completion date | September 7, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | July 19, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Key Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy. - Measurable disease as defined per RECIST v. 1.1. Tumor lesions previously irradiated or subjected to other locoregional therapy will only be deemed measureable if disease progression at the treated site after completion of therapy is clearly documented. - HPV- negative SCCHN tumor as determined per institutional standard (eg, p16 IHC; multiplex nucleic acid sequence based amplification [NASBA] or other polymerase chain reaction [PCR]-based assays). - Documented progressive disease according to RECIST v1.1 (Appendix 2) following receipt of at least 2 cycles of one platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen administered for R/M disease (min. 50 mg/m2 for cisplatin, minimum area under the curve [AUC] > 4 for carboplatin). - Availability of a tumor tissue specimen (ie, archived formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue [block preferred, or 15 unstained slides]), which will be used for centralized, retrospective biomarker analysis. If archived tumor tissue is not available, then a de novo biopsy will be required for patient participation. Key Exclusion Criteria: - Prior nasopharyngeal cancer, salivary gland or sinus tumors. - More than one chemotherapeutic regimen given for R/M disease. Prior treatment with immunotherapy is allowed. - Known active uncontrolled or symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases, carcinomatous meningitis, or leptomeningeal disease as indicated by clinical symptoms, cerebral edema, and/or progressive growth. Patients with a history of CNS metastases or cord compression are eligible if they have been definitively treated with local therapy (eg, radiotherapy, stereotactic surgery) and are clinically stable off anticonvulsants and steroids for at least 4 weeks before randomization. - Progressive disease within 3 months after completion of curatively intended treatment for locoregionally advanced SCCHN. - Difficulty swallowing capsules. - Prior use of cetuximab in the R/M disease treatment setting (except cetuximab during curative radiotherapy) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Czechia | Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc | Olomouc | |
Czechia | Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc, Lekarna | Olomouc | |
Czechia | Nemocnice Na Bulovce, Centralni laboratore Pavilon c. 8 | Praha 8 | |
Czechia | Nemocnice Na Bulovce, Lekarna, Oddeleni Centralni pripravy | Praha 8 | |
Czechia | Nemocnice Na Bulovce, Ustav radiacni onkologie | Praha 8 | |
Hungary | Debreceni Egyetem klinikai Koezpont Onkologiai Intezet | Debrecen | |
Hungary | Neuro CT Kft | Pecs | |
Hungary | Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem, Klinikai Kozpont, | Pecs | |
Hungary | Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem, Klinikai Kozpont, Laboratoriumi | Pecs | |
Hungary | Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Hetenyi Geza Korhaz-Rendelointezet,Onkologiai Kozpont | Szolnok | |
Italy | Istituto Nazionale Tumori Napoli | Napoli | |
Japan | National Cancer Center Hospital East | Kashiwa | Chiba |
Japan | Aichi cancer center Central hospital | Nagoya | Aichi |
Japan | Hokkaido University Hospital/Otolaryngology | Sapporo | Hokkaido |
Japan | Shizuoka Cancer Center | Sunto-gun | Shizuoka |
Korea, Republic of | Asan Medical Center | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Samsung Medical Center | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | |
Mexico | Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia | Mexico | Distrito Federal |
Mexico | Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez | Monterrey | Nuevo LEON |
Mexico | Cirugia y Ginecobstetricia de Oaxaca S.A de C.V Hospital Reforma | Oaxaca | Oaxaca DE Juarez |
Mexico | Daniel Javier Mendez Lopez Imagen y Diagnostico Medico IDM | Oaxaca | Oaxaca DE Juarez |
Mexico | Diaz San Juan Noe, Imagenologia Siglo XXI San Felipe | Oaxaca | Oaxaca DE Juarez |
Mexico | Oaxaca Site Management Organization S C | Oaxaca | |
Poland | Szpital Specjalistyczny w Brzozowie Podkarpacki Osrodek Onkologiczny im. ks. B. Markiewicza | Brzozow | |
Poland | Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii | Gdansk | |
Poland | Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. M. Kopernika w Lodzi Oddzial Chemioterapii | Lodz | |
Poland | SPZOZ MSWiA z Warminsko-Mazurskim Centrum Onkologii w Olsztynie Oddzial Kliniczny Onkologii | Olsztyn | |
Romania | SC Medisprof SRL | Cluj-Napoca | Cluj |
Romania | Centrul de Oncologie Sf. Nectarie SRL | Craiova | Dolj |
Romania | SC Oncolab SRL | Craiova | Dolj |
Romania | Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Sibiu, Clinica Oncologie Medicala | Sibiu | |
Romania | S.C. ONCOCENTER Oncologie Clinica S.R.L. | Timisoara | Timis |
Russian Federation | State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Arkhangelsk Region | Arkhangelsk | Arkhangelsk Region |
Russian Federation | State Autonomous Healthcare Institution Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Ministry | Kazan | Tatarstan Republic |
Russian Federation | FSBI "National Medical Scientific Centre of Oncology n.a.N.N.Petrov" of the MOH of Russia | Saint-Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Oncology Center #2" of the Ministry of | Sochi | Krasnodar Region |
Serbia | Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia | Belgrade | |
Serbia | Military Medical Academy | Belgrade | |
Slovakia | Narodny onkologicky ustav | Bratislava | |
Slovakia | POKO Poprad, s.r.o. | Poprad | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Madrid | |
Spain | Servicio de Oncologia | Pamplona | Navarra |
Taiwan | China Medical University Hospital | Taichung | |
Taiwan | Taichung Veterans General Hospital | Taichung City | |
Taiwan | National Cheng Kung University Hospital | Tainan | |
Taiwan | National Cheng Kung University Hospital Department of Pathology | Tainan | |
Taiwan | Tri-Service General Hospital | Taipei | |
Ukraine | Communal Institution of Kherson Regional Council Kherson Regional Oncological Dispensary | Antonivka | Kherson Region |
Ukraine | Communal Institution "Chernivtsi Regional clinical oncology dispensary", | Chernivtsy | |
Ukraine | CI Dnipropetrovsk City Multifunctional Clinical Hospital #4 of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council | Dnipropetrovsk | |
Ukraine | SI Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of MoH of Ukraine, Chair of Oncology and Medical Radiology | Dnipropetrovsk | |
Ukraine | Regional Clinical Hospital, Department of microsurgery of otolaryngology organs | Ivano-Frankivsk | |
Ukraine | Communal Institution "Krivorizhskiy Oncology Dispensary" of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, | Kriviy Rig | |
Ukraine | Clinic of SI "Institute of Otolaryngology n.a. Prof. O.S. Kolomyichenka of NAMSU" | Kyiv | |
Ukraine | Podilskiy Regional Center of Oncology, Chemotherapy Department | Vinnytsia | |
United States | University of Cincinnati Investigational Pharmacy | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | University of Cincinnati Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Siteman Cancer Center - West County | Creve Coeur | Missouri |
United States | UC San Diego Medical Center - La Jolla (Thornton Hospital) | La Jolla | California |
United States | UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center | La Jolla | California |
United States | University Medical Center, lnc.:DBA University of Louisville Hospital | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Henry Joyce Cancer Clinic | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota |
United States | Barnes-Jewish Hospital | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Siteman Cancer Center - South County | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Siteman Cancer Center | Saint Peters | Missouri |
United States | UC San Diego Medical Center- Hillcrest | San Diego | California |
United States | UC Health Physicians Office South | West Chester | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
United States, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - randomization date +1)/30.4. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization had their OS times be censored at randomization. Estimates of OS and its 95% confidence interval were determined using Kaplan-Meier method. | Baseline up to primary completion date (PCD) (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. Estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan Meier method were presented. | Baseline up to PCD (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) | OR was defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Objective response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR relative to all randomized. | Baseline up to PCD (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) | CBR was defined as the overall CR, PR, or stable disease>=24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Clinical benefit response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease>= 24 weeks relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. | Baseline up to PCD (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Duration of Response (DR) | DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the date response ended (ie, date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1]/30.4. | Baseline up to PCD (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events(TEAEs) | AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of the causal relationship to study treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs which occurred for the first time during the effective duration of treatment or AEs that increased in severity during treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or caused prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduction normal life functions). AEs included SAEs and non-serious AEs. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator. Severity was graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. | From the first dose through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of the study treatment (up to 6.9 years) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities | The hematology, chemistry and coagulation tests were included in the laboratory examination. Hematology evaluation included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell, absolute neutrophils, absolute lymphocytes. Chemistry evaluation included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, creatinine, uric acid, glucose (non-fasted), albumin, phosphorus or phosphate and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Coagulation evaluation included activated partial thromboplastin time/partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio (INR) or prothrombin time. | From the Screening (Day -28) through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of the study treatment (up to 7 years) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) | The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning), 3 multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global health/quality of life (QOL) subscale, and 6 single items assessing other cancer related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite, diarrhea, constipation, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employed twenty-eight 4 point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7 point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning and all scores were converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For symptom oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms, and all scores were converted to a 0-100 scale. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in functioning / global QoL scales and improvement in symptom scales. | Baseline up to PCD (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Module35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) | The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is designed to be used together with the core QLQ-C30. The recall period for the items in the module was "the past week". Items hn1 to hn30 were scored on 4 point Likert type categorical scales ("not at all", "a little", "quite a bit", "very much"). Items hn31 to hn35 had a "no/yes" response format. The scores were transformed into 0 to 100 scales, with a high score implying a high level of symptoms.Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in functioning / global QoL scales and improvement in symptom scales. | Baseline up to PCD (about 34 months) | |
Secondary | Summary of PFS and OS for P16 Negative (%Positive Tumor Cells < 70%) | A central test was defined as the tumor tissue-based p16 IHC test performed at a central laboratory (Ventana). The analysis of concordance between HPV status as assessed by local or central laboratory included the number and percentage of participants with p16 detected or not detected at the central laboratory, given that all local testing must have been negative for HPV in order for the patient to be eligible for the study. Initial analysis of the p16 status was based on the conventional cutoff of 70% p16-positive tumor cells to call out cases that might be considered HPV-positive. P16 expression was scored as positive if strong and diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was present in at least 70% of the tumor cells. | Screening | |
Secondary | Summary of PFS and OS Based on Investigator Assessment by Rb Expression >= 1% | Rb expression in the palbociclib and cetuximab treatment group, the relationship of the biomarker (individually) with PFS and OS were explored using graphical methods such as box plots, at baseline. The tumors of participants were Rb-positive, which was defined by Rb IHC with>=1% positive tumor cells. | Screening | |
Secondary | Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) and Within-participant Mean Steady-state Pre-dose Concentration (WPM-Ctrough) at Steady State for Palbociblib | Ctrough is steady-state pre-dose concentration, which was observed directly from data. WPM-Ctrough is within-participant mean steady-state pre-dose concentration. For palbociclib, a steady-state trough was to be defined as a pre-dose plasma concentration following at least 7 consecutive days of 125 mg daily dose without dosing interruption and the time window for the PK collection was to be between 24 hr +/- 2 hr and 24 min post-dose the day prior to PK collection and no more than 1 hr post-dose on the day of PK collection. | Pre-dose of Day 15 in Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 | |
Secondary | Ctrough and Cendinf, WPM-Ctrough and WPM-Cendinf at Steady State for Serum Cetuximab | Ctrough is steady-state pre-dose concentration. Cendinf is steady-state end-of-infusion concentration. Ctrough and Cendinf were observed directly from data. WPM-Ctrough and WPM-Cendinf are within-participant mean steady-state pre-dose concentration and end-of-infusion concentration. Acceptance criteria for a steady-state Cendinf was defined as a PK sample that was 1) collected after at least 3 consecutive weeks of cetuximab IV infusions without interruption or prior dose reduction and 2) was collected at the end of cetuximab infusion time +/- 10% of the actual duration of the cetuximab infusion. | Pre-dose and end-of infusion of Day 15 in Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01204099 -
Study of PX-866 and Docetaxel in Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04989387 -
Study of INCA 0186 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00392665 -
Bevacizumab/Tarceva and Tarceva/Sulindac in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05057247 -
Duvelisib Plus Docetaxel In Recurrent/Metastatic HNSCC
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02001623 -
Tisotumab Vedotin (HuMax®-TF-ADC) Safety Study in Patients With Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01285635 -
A Study of AT-101 in Combination With Docetaxel in Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of The Head and Neck
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03538028 -
A Safety and Tolerability Study of INCAGN02385 in Select Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02335918 -
A Dose Escalation and Cohort Expansion Study of Anti-CD27 (Varlilumab) and Anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab) in Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04052204 -
Avelumab With Bempegaldesleukin With or Without Talazoparib or Enzalutamide in Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03405142 -
Panitumumab-IRDye800 Compared to Sentinel Node Biopsy and (Selective) Neck Dissection in Identifying Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Head&Neck Cancer
|
Phase 2 |