Bilateral Varus Rotational Osteotomy Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Intravenous E-Aminocaproic Acid (EACA) on Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements After Bilateral Varus Rotational Osteotomy (VRO)
| Verified date | November 2022 |
| Source | Hospital for Special Surgery, New York |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
E-Aminocaproic acid (EACA) is an anti-fibrinolytic agent that is used to decrease blood loss and transfusion requirements after several orthopedic procedures. The aim of this prospective double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial is to determine whether IV EACA reduces intra-operative calculated total blood loss in patients undergoing bilateral varus rotational osteotomy (VRO). This study will also investigate intraoperative cell saver utilization, transfusion of allogeneic blood, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), short term complications, and long-term outcomes.This study will provide Level I evidence and has the potential to improve outcomes in children undergoing this procedure.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 28 |
| Est. completion date | October 26, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | October 26, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 1 Year to 18 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Scheduled for bilateral varus rotational osteotomy (VRO) with or without associated soft tissue and osseous procedures Exclusion Criteria: - Preoperative use of an anticoagulant (Plavix, warfarin, lovenox, etc.) - History of hypersensitivity to EACA - History of thromboembolic event (e.g., PE or DVT) - History of renal insufficiency or failure - Congenital or acquired coagulopathy as evidence by INR >1.4 or PTT > 1.4 times normal, or Platelets <150,000/mm3 on preoperative laboratory testing - Use of hormone replacement therapy or hormonal contraceptive agents within days prior to surgery - Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), antiplatelet agents within 7 days prior to surgery - Pregnant - Breastfeeding - Not received neuraxial anesthesia |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Hospital for Special Surgery | New York | New York |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Hospital for Special Surgery, New York |
United States,
Chimento GF, Huff T, Ochsner JL Jr, Meyer M, Brandner L, Babin S. An evaluation of the use of topical tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.037. — View Citation
Eubanks JD. Antifibrinolytics in major orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Mar;18(3):132-8. Review. — View Citation
Faraoni D, Goobie SM. The efficacy of antifibrinolytic drugs in children undergoing noncardiac surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg. 2014 Mar;118(3):628-36. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000080. Review. — View Citation
Florentino-Pineda I, Blakemore LC, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C, Adler P, Tripi P. The Effect of epsilon-aminocaproic acid on perioperative blood loss in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion: a preliminary prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 15;26(10):1147-51. — View Citation
Gill JB, Chin Y, Levin A, Feng D. The use of antifibrinolytic agents in spine surgery. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2399-407. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01179. Review. — View Citation
McLeod LM, French B, Flynn JM, Dormans JP, Keren R. Antifibrinolytic Use and Blood Transfusions in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgeries Performed at US Children's Hospitals. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Oct;28(8):E460-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a22a54. — View Citation
Thompson GH, Florentino-Pineda I, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Son-Hing J. Role of Amicar in surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 15;33(24):2623-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318187c046. — View Citation
Thompson GH, Florentino-Pineda I, Poe-Kochert C. The role of amicar in decreasing perioperative blood loss in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17 Suppl):S94-9. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Intraoperative Calculated Total Blood Loss | Determined by estimated blood volume, calculated using difference in preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and applied to the Nadler equation for estimating blood volume while adjusting for transfused hemoglobin to produce a single metric of calculated intraoperative blood loss. | Intraoperative (3-6 hours) | |
| Secondary | Intraoperative Cell Saver Utilization | Number of participants requiring 1 unit of intraoperative cell saver transfusion. Patients either received or did not receive intraoperative cell saver transfusion. The maximum number of intraoperative units transfused in this study was 1 unit. The count of participants in the data table refers to the number of patients who received this transfusion. | Intraoperative, 1 day | |
| Secondary | Postoperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion | The number of participants that required 1 unit of blood transfused post-operatively. Patients received blood if necessary post operatively, and the maximum number of units a patient received was 1. The count of participants refers to the number of patients who received this transfusion unit. | Post-Surgery, an expected average of 1 week | |
| Secondary | Post Operative Blood Loss | 24 hour drain output (mL) | Post-Surgery, 24 hours | |
| Secondary | Length of Hospital Stay | postoperative day of discharge after surgery- day of intake. | Post-Surgery, an expected average of 1 week | |
| Secondary | Complications [VTE (Symptomatic of DVT or PE), Infection (Superficial, Deep), Hematoma, Seroma, Reoperation, and Death] | Incidence of VTE (symptomatic of DVT or PE), infection (superficial, deep), hematoma, seroma, reoperation, and death, measured in person-years ( x cases per 100,000 person years) | an expected average of 1 week (post-surgery), Follow-up at 6 weeks |