Infrainguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Understanding the Mechanism of Peripheral Arterial Balloon Angioplasty by the Chocolate PTA Balloon Catheter Compared to Conventional PTA Balloons Via OCT Imaging
The purpose of this study is to compare the Chocolate PTA Balloon to standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) catheters. The investigators will use Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Quantitative Vascular Angiography to evaluate the acute vascular response of vessels treated with the Chocolate Balloon to a standard balloon catheter, with the primary endpoint being luminal gain assessed by OCT lumen volume measurements.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | March 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) between 2.5 and 6.0mm and within treatment range of available balloon at Target Lesion - Intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia (Rutherford 3-5) - De novo stenosis (=70%) or occlusion in the infrainguinal arteries, including superficial femoral artery (SFA), popliteal, and infrapopliteal arteries. - Lesion successfully crossed with a guide-wire - Patient has given informed consent to participate in this study Exclusion Criteria: - Lesion requiring ablative procedures (i.e. atherectomy or laser) as part of treatment - Lesion length >75mm - Previous bypass or stent at target vessel or proximal to target vessel - Significant in-flow disease at target lesion - Known inadequate distal outflow disease or planned treatment of vessel distal to target lesion - Acute limb ischemia or need for thrombolytic therapy - Known intolerance to required study medications, contrast media, or nitinol - Known impaired Renal Function with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <45 ml/min per 1.73m2 - Known bleeding disorder or uncontrolled hypercoagulable disorder. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Case Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
TriReme Medical, LLC | University Hospital Case Medical Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Luminal Gain | Luminal Gain as defined by OCT lumen volume measurements. Luminal gain is assessed as the percentage change comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment volume measurements in cubic centimeters (CC) or millimeters (m3). | Average of 90 minutes | No |
Secondary | Dissection | Dissection severity (extension) as defined by both angiographic and OCT metrics. Dissections occur when the blood goes into the vessel wall instead of staying in the vessel lumen. Dissection severity is determined by a visual review of the angiogram and OCT images by an independent core lab. Dissections are classified as flow-limiting (more severe) vs. non-flow limiting (less severe) based upon the amount of the blood that is flowing into the vessel wall. |
Average of 90 minutes | No |
Secondary | Hematoma | Presence of intramural hematoma on OCT. A hematoma can be visually observed on a angiogram and an OCT image. The images will be independently reviewed by a core lab expert who will document if a hematoma is present or not. |
Average of 90 minutes | No |
Secondary | Optimal PTA | Achievement of Optimal PTA (<30% Diameter stenosis without flow limiting dissection) <30% Diameter stenosis and flow limiting dissections are visual assessments that will be conducted by an independent core lab review. The % diameter stenosis measures the amount of plaque that is in the vessel and a flow-limiting dissection is observed as either present or not present. |
Average of 90 minutes | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05450042 -
Vascular Effects Through Sirolimus vs. Paclitaxel DCB Implantation
|
N/A |