Characterising Metastatic Penile Cancer Using Molecular Imaging - Hybrid MRI-PET [MRI-PET]

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis Clinical Trial

— MRI-PET  

Official title:

Characterising Metastatic Penile Cancer Using Molecular Imaging - Hybrid MRI-PET [MRI-PET]

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02104063
• Other study ID #: 008956QM
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: November 18, 2013
• Last updated: September 29, 2017
• Start date: October 2013
• Est. completion date: March 2018

Study information

• Verified date: January 2015
• Source: Queen Mary University of London
• Contact: Manit Arya, MBChB FRCS
• Email: bci-mri-pet[@]qmul.ac.uk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The presence of metastatic disease in the lymph nodes within the groin is the most important factor in predicting the long-term outcome for patients diagnosed with penile cancer.

In the majority of patients diagnosed with penile cancer obvious abnormalities cannot be felt in the groin even though the cancer may have already spread to the lymph nodes in the groin. In these patients, a procedure called Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (DSLB) is required to determine if the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes in the groin. In DSLB a radioactive substance is injected at the site of the penile cancer and then travels to the lymph nodes in the groin which are then biopsied. This procedure requires a general anaesthetic and an in-patient hospital stay.

In approximately 20% of patients with penile cancer obvious abnormalities can be felt in the lymph nodes in the groin. However, any abnormality detected may not necessarily be due to metastatic disease. In order to confirm if metastatic disease is present in the lymph nodes of these patients a biopsy is also required. However in these patients the lymph nodes are detected and biopsied using an ultrasound scan rather than by passing a radioactive substance into the body.

MRI-PET is a new procedure which combines conventional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans into one scan. MRI - PET scans create very clear pictures of internal body structures. MRI-PET is a non-invasive procedure which can be performed on an out-patient basis.

The accuracy of MRI-PET in detecting metastatic penile cancer is not known. The main purpose of this study is to establish the effectiveness of MRI-PET compared to DSLB and ultrasound guided biopsy in detecting the presence of metastatic disease in the lymph nodes of patients with penile cancer. If effective, MRI-PET could replace the invasive procedures currently required for detection of metastatic penile cancer.

Description:

Penile cancer is a neglected area in terms of clinical and molecular research due to the relatively low incidence of the disease (age standardized incidence is 0.3 - 1 per 100,000 men in European countries and the USA). Inguinal nodes are impalpable in up to 80% of penile cancer patients on presentation. However, 20% of these will harbour occult metastases. Therefore radical inguinal lymphadenectomy, with its significant associated morbidity of up to 70% (and mortality), is an unnecessary surgical procedure in the majority of patients. There are presently only limited data available from small series pertaining to the role of radiological imaging modalities establishing the presence of lymph node metastases, particularly micrometastases, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Thus there is no clear role at the moment for radiological investigations in staging men with impalpable inguinal lymph nodes at presentation. Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy is an invasive procedure which utilizes lymphoscintigraphy but still requires surgical excision of the lymph nodes.

Simultaneous PET and MRI using new hybrid MRI-PET systems promises optimal spatial and temporal co-registration of structural, functional, and molecular image data. The theoretical advantages of hybrid MRI-PET scanning compared to CT-PET are better soft tissue resolution, which is advantageous for the small lymph nodes, and also decreased radiation exposure. Also, local staging of the primary penile tumour could be performed simultaneously with the inguinal lymph nodes using MRI-PET. If effective, MRI-PET would provide a single non-invasive imaging test that would replace dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (which is operator dependent, involves a general anaesthetic, in-patient hospital stay and has associated morbidity) in the detection of micrometastatic deposits in those patients with cN0 (impalpable inguinal lymph nodes) disease. In addition to this, a single MRI-PET sequence will also stage the primary lesion.

University College London Hospital (UCLH) manages the largest number of penile cancer patients in the United Kingdom (UK). Hybrid MRI-PET is a new imaging modality which could result in significant cost savings, and more importantly, avoid invasive operative procedures necessitating in-patient hospital stay (with the associated potential for significant morbidity). UCLH currently has the only hybrid MRI-PET scanner in the UK. This research is unique and groundbreaking and could have a dramatic impact for penile cancer patients. Additionally, as serum, blood and frozen tissue from this cohort of patients will be collected and stored , this will provide an extremely valuable resource for future translational studies.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 107
• Est. completion date: March 2018
• Est. primary completion date: March 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

• Men aged >= 18 years.

• Willing and able to give written informed consent prior to study entry.

• Patients must be sterile or agree to use adequate contraception during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Any co-existing medical condition that in the Investigator's judgement will substantially increase the risk associated with the patient's participation in the study.

• Any known contraindication to MRI such as ferrous metal implants, electrical implants (e.g. cochlear implants, cardiac pacemaker), or history of injury involving metal fragments.

• Any known contraindication to PET scans.

• Any known allergy to FDG (18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose).

• Uncontrolled diabetes.

• Inability to comply with the study procedures.

• Medical or psychiatric illness, which makes the patient unsuitable or unable to give informed consent.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
• Penile Neoplasms
• Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis

Intervention

Procedure:
• MRI-PET
Participants will have an MRI-PET scan (the Index test) in addition to the procedures they would normally receive as their standard of care (Reference tests). The accuracy of MRI-PET in detecting or ruling out metastatic penile cancer will be compared to the reference tests.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	University College London Hospitals	London

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Queen Mary University of London

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (16)

Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Artibani W, Fandella A, Martignoni G, Novara G, Galetti TP, Zambolin T, Kattan MW; G.U.O.N.E. Penile Cancer Project Members. Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1700-4; discussion 1704-5. — View Citation

Hegarty PK, Kayes O, Freeman A, Christopher N, Ralph DJ, Minhas S. A prospective study of 100 cases of penile cancer managed according to European Association of Urology guidelines. BJU Int. 2006 Sep;98(3):526-31. — View Citation

Heyns CF, Fleshner N, Sangar V, Schlenker B, Yuvaraja TB, van Poppel H. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer. Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.001. Review. — View Citation

Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF, Moonen LM, Lustig V, van Waardenburg EW. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes. J Urol. 1993 Mar;149(3):492-7. — View Citation

Horenblas S, van Tinteren H. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urol. 1994 May;151(5):1239-43. — View Citation

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66. — View Citation

Leijte JA, Hughes B, Graafland NM, Kroon BK, Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Corbishley C, Heenan S, Watkin N, Horenblas S. Two-center evaluation of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 10;27(20):3325-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6870. Epub 2009 May 4. — View Citation

Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Moonen LM, Horenblas S. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):947-52; discussion 952. — View Citation

Ornellas AA, Kinchin EW, Nóbrega BL, Wisnescky A, Koifman N, Quirino R. Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Brazilian National Cancer Institute long-term experience. J Surg Oncol. 2008 May 1;97(6):487-95. doi: 10.1002/jso.20980. — View Citation

Pandey D, Mahajan V, Kannan RR. Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis. J Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;93(2):133-8. — View Citation

Parkin DM, Muir CS. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Comparability and quality of data. IARC Sci Publ. 1992;(120):45-173. — View Citation

Protzel C, Alcaraz A, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro G, Zlotta A, Hakenberg OW. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1075-88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Feb 23. Review. — View Citation

Ravi R. Correlation between the extent of nodal involvement and survival following groin dissection for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol. 1993 Nov;72(5 Pt 2):817-9. — View Citation

Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Pettaway CA. The role of lymphadenectomy in penile cancer. Urol Oncol. 2004 May-Jun;22(3):236-44; discussion 244-5. Review. — View Citation

Srinivas V, Morse MJ, Herr HW, Sogani PC, Whitmore WF Jr. Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival. J Urol. 1987 May;137(5):880-2. — View Citation

Wespes E. The management of regional lymph nodes in patients with penile carcinoma and reliability of sentinel node biopsy. Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):15-6; discussion 20-1. Epub 2007 Mar 1. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Evaluating the clinical validity (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) of whole-body MRI-PET to detect or exclude micrometastatic disease in inguinal lymph nodes.	Evaluating the clinical validity (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) of whole-body MRI-PET imaging to detect or exclude micrometastatic disease in inguinal lymph nodes in patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis using dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as the reference standard for clinically impalpable inguinal lymph nodes and ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration/ excisional biopsy as the reference standard in patients with clinically palpable inguinal lymph nodes.	3 years