Dermatitis, Adverse Drug Reaction Clinical Trial
— B-DUOLOfficial title:
EFFECTIVENESS OF MARY D'UOL REPAIR BALM FOR PREVENTING AND / OR REDUCING TOXICITY SKIN IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER AND TREATMENT WITH ANY Antineoplastic Agent. RANDOM CLINICAL TRIAL.
Capecitabine is a drug that produces dermatologic toxicity frequently (palmoplantar
erythrodysesthesia, rash , alopecia , erythema , dryness, pruritus, hyperpigmentation ,
rash, peeling , dermatitis , abnormal pigmentation, and less often blistering, skin ulcers ,
photosensitivity reactions, swelling of the face and purple) . The impact in patients'
quality of life is great, so We had decided to conduct a randomized clinical trial to
evaluate the effectiveness Mary D' uol balm preventing dermatologic toxicity in patient
treated with capecitabine .
Design: Randomized clinical trial phase II, in parallel and double-blind groups
Target population : Patients with colon cancer stage II or III ( Dukes' C ) , who will
initiate treatment with capecitabine monotherapy.
Inclusion criteria: Over 18 years, II or III colon (Dukes' C) colon cancer, primary
diagnosis, capecitabine monotherapy, sign the informed consent.
Primary endpoint: Dermatologic toxicity (yes / no) Statistical analysis: The primary
endpoint (percentage of patients that develop dermalogic toxocity in both groups) will be
analyzed by a logistics regression model
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 86 |
Est. completion date | June 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Over 18 years. - Sign the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with neoadjuvant treatment. - Patients with dermatologic diseases. - Patients treated with corticosteroids. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Prevention
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | University hospital of Araba | Vitoria-Gasteiz | Álava |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Basque Health Service |
Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of patients who develop dermatologic toxicity. | Compare the percentage of patients who develop dermatologic toxicity in any grade (1-5) between intervention and control group at three months of starting treatment, through CTCAE scale (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). | 3 moths | Yes |
Secondary | Need of pharmacological treatment to mitigate toxicity | Compare the percentage of patients in both groups who required pharmacological treatment to mitigate the dermatologic toxicity produced by chemotherapy | 3 months | Yes |
Secondary | Quality of life | Compare the quality of life in both groups at three months, through the Skindex 29 scale to evaluate the quality of life due to skin disease. | 3 months | No |
Secondary | Percentaje of patients who have reduces skin toxicity | 3 months | Yes |