Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed Patients

Airway Complication of Anaesthesia Clinical Trial

Official title: Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery With Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators aimed to compare of the i-gel, supreme and proseal laryngeal mask airways in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with oropharyngeal leak pressure. The investigators also studied their relative ease of insertion, time to insertion and complications of use as secondary outcome measures.

Clinical Trial Description

A total of 105 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopic procedures in our Inonu University Medical Faculty Hospital were recruited.They were equally randomized into three groups: PLMA, supreme and i-gel groups. All three devices were compared with regard to oropharyngeal leak pressure, number and duration of insertion attempts and complications of airway. Oropharyngeal leak pressure will evaluate including to start,trendelenburg and postoperative at period. Fiberoptic evaluation of the LMA's position were performed after successful insertion and determination of the airway pressures. After one hour patients were evaluated by a blinded independent observer for postoperative complications ( sore throat, dysphonia and dysphagia). ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Airway Complication of Anaesthesia

• NCT number: NCT01909297
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Inonu University
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 2013
• Completion date: July 2013