Liver Cell Carcinoma Non-resectable Clinical Trial
— DEBDOXOfficial title:
Observational Prospective Study on Chemoembolization Using Doxorubicin Drug-eluting Bead in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
| NCT number | NCT01891539 |
| Other study ID # | DEBDOX01 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Phase | |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | May 2013 |
| Est. completion date | December 2021 |
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common type of cancer in men and the seventh
in women and is the third most common cause of death from cancer worldwide. The overall
incidence of HCC remains high in developing countries and is steadily rising in most
industrialized countries.
TACE with Doxorubicin-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) has recently been developed as a novel therapy
option for HCC. In order to maximize its therapeutic efficacy, doxorubicin-loaded beads were
developed to deliver higher doses of the chemotherapeutic agent and to prolong its permanence
within the tumor. The comparison of efficacy and safety of TACE with drug-eluting
microspheres in comparison with conventional TACE (cTACE) showed that response and time to
progression in the group was significantly higher than that of the cTACE group. TACE with
drug-eluting microspheres thus appears to be a feasible and promising approach to the
treatment of HCC.
This study's purpose is evaluating treatment efficacy, survival rate and safety of TACE using
drug-eluting microspheres loaded with doxorubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 100 |
| Est. completion date | December 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 2021 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HCC 2. Patient with HCC not suitable for radical therapies such as resection, liver transplantation or percutaneous therapies or patient is indicated for these therapies but there is a contraindication for them or patient rejects the above treatments 3. Multinodular or single nodular tumor more than 5cm 4. Hypervascular lesion showing contrast enhancement in the early stage after contrast media injection during CT or MRI. 5. At least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable according to the Modified RECIST criteria by CT-scan or MRI 6. No invasion in the blood vessel (hepatic portal, hepatic vein) or bile duct 7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status is 0 - 1 8. Proper blood, liver, renal, heart functionality 9. more than 18 years old 10. Expected survival more than 6 months 11. Prior written consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Extrahepatic metastasis (Any lymph nodes measuring = 10mm along the short axis) 2. Tumor burden involving more than 50% of the liver 3. History of biliary tract repair or endoscopic biliary tract treatment 4. Clinically important refractory ascites or pleural fluid 5. Any contraindications for hepatic embolization procedures 6. Any contraindication for doxorubicin administration 7. Contrast media allergy contraindicating angiography 8. Acute or active cardiac, hepatic or renal diseases 9. Pregnant, nursing or childbearing age women and men who are sexually active and don't want to or can't do contraception |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Presidio Ospedaliero San Salvatore | Pesaro | PU |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| International Group of Endovascular Oncology |
Italy,
Fiorentini G, Campanini A, Dazzi C, Davitti B, Graziani G, Priori T, Ricci Bitti R, Angelini L. Chemoembolization in liver malignant involvement. Experiences on 17 cases. Minerva Chir. 1994 Apr;49(4):281-5. — View Citation
Fiorentini G. A new tool to enhance the efficacy of chemoembolization to treat primary and metastatic hepatic tumors. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011 Apr;8(4):409-13. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2011.565327. Epub 2011 Mar 18. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | tumor response | CT scan evaluation according to RECIST 1.1 | 4 months | |
| Secondary | survival rate | patients alive after 12 months | one year | |
| Secondary | time to progression | time from start of therapy to progression | 1 year |