Adult-acquired Flatfoot Disorder (AAFD) Clinical Trial
— WBCTOfficial title:
In-Vivo Physiologic Weight-Bearing Assessment of Tarsal Instability: Three-Dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis
Verified date | January 2018 |
Source | Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Ohio |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to compare the average joint motion and joint axis orientation of the hindfoot bones between patients diagnosed with adult-acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD) and a control group of patients without foot deformity, using weight-bearing CT technology.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 23 |
Est. completion date | November 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Symptomatic group: Inclusion Criteria: 1. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) diagnosed with Stage 2 AAFD Exclusion Criteria: 1. previous surgery 2. infection 3. tumor in the affected foot 4. pregnancy Control group: Inclusion Criteria: 1. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) without foot deformity Exclusion Criteria: 1. history of previous foot and ankle surgery 2. foot deformity 3. known foot and ankle pathology 4. pregnancy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center | Westerville | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, Ohio | CurveBeam LLC |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicular | Relative motion, which is the position of the full weightbearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) navicular in comparison to the touch down weightbearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) navicular position, will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across these two points on one CT scan. The difference between the two positions is reported below. | 1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing | |
Primary | Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing | Relative motion across joint segments will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across two time points: touch-down bearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) and full-weight bearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) as measured on CT. | 1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing |