Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01800344
Other study ID # 11-0392-A
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 8, 2013
Last updated February 25, 2013
Start date January 2012
Est. completion date October 2012

Study information

Verified date February 2013
Source University Health Network, Toronto
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: UHN Research Ethics Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the AES Ultra CPVTM or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.


Description:

Recent evidence suggests that reduction of LMA intracuff pressure may decrease the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms. Yet, pressure manometers are not widely available limiting the application of a strategy of intracuff pressure reduction. The Ultra airway has been designed to provide continuous indication of intracuff pressure and can limit the intracuff pressure to < 60 cm H2O. This study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the Ultra or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 170
Est. completion date October 2012
Est. primary completion date October 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III

- 18 to 65 years of age

- Ambulatory patients scheduled to undergo knee arthroscopy, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, hand, gynecological, general surgical and eye procedures under a short general anesthesia of less than 2 hours

- Spontaneously breathing on the LMA

Exclusion Criteria:

- Reduced mouth opening less than 2.5cm

- Recent history of upper respiratory tract infection and sore throats

- Contraindications of LMA use (Morbid obesity with body mass index greater than 40kg/m2, symptomatic hiatus hernia, esophageal reflux disease)

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • The Study Focuses on the Effect of a New Supraglottic Airway With Built-in Cuff Pressure Indicator on Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Adverse Events

Intervention

Device:
LMA

Ultra
Ultra

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Univeristy Health Network- Toronto Western Hospital Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Health Network, Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The primary outcome, composite pharyngolaryngeal complication, is defined as the presence of either sore throat, dysphonia or dysphagia at 1, 2, and 24 h postoperatively. 1, 2, 24 hours No
Secondary Intracuff pressure Intracuff pressure intraoperative 10 post insertion intraoperative No