Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the AES Ultra CPVTM or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.


Clinical Trial Description

Recent evidence suggests that reduction of LMA intracuff pressure may decrease the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms. Yet, pressure manometers are not widely available limiting the application of a strategy of intracuff pressure reduction. The Ultra airway has been designed to provide continuous indication of intracuff pressure and can limit the intracuff pressure to < 60 cm H2O. This study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the Ultra or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • The Study Focuses on the Effect of a New Supraglottic Airway With Built-in Cuff Pressure Indicator on Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Adverse Events

NCT number NCT01800344
Study type Interventional
Source University Health Network, Toronto
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date January 2012
Completion date October 2012