Patients Undergoing Contrast Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography of the Chest, Abdomen, Liver or Aorta for Any Diagnostic Cause Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized Study of Standard vs. Patient-Adapted Protocols in Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) of the Chest, Abdomen, Liver or Aorta
| Verified date | September 2013 |
| Source | Bracco Diagnostics, Inc |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
| Study type | Observational |
Collection of data from different sites regardless of whether they use standard or tailored protocols for the application of high concentration iodinated contrast agents to assess if the individually patient-adapted protocols result in a similar diagnostic image quality.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 1493 |
| Est. completion date | July 2013 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 2013 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - At least 18 years of age - Scheduled to undergo contrast enhanced MDCT of the abdomen, liver, aorta, or chest - Provides written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Previously enrolled and completed the study - Known allergy to iodinated contrast media - Pregnancy or lactation - Clinically unsuitable for the study |
Observational Model: Case-Only, Time Perspective: Prospective
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | Oepedale Niguarda | Milan | |
| United States | Department of Radiology Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Bracco Diagnostics, Inc |
United States, Italy,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Diagnostic Quality | Images are to be assessed according to the following scale: 0=Uninterpretable (Image quality severely affected by motion artifacts or technical reasons; need to repeat the examination); 1=Insufficient (Impaired image quality precludes adequate diagnostic assessment because of severe image noise or insufficient contrast enhancement; need to repeat the examination); 2=Adequate (Image quality in terms of noise and contrast enhancement does not interfere with sufficient diagnostic assessment; delineation of small structures may be suboptimal); or 3=Good (Absent or minimal image noise and good contrast enhancement allow adequate diagnostic assessment with clear delineation of even small structures). | Immediately after the single injection of contrast agent | No |