Phalanx of Supernumerary Digit of Hand Clinical Trial
Official title:
Triphalangeal Thumbs in the Pediatric Population: Long Term Outcomes Following Surgical Intervention
A triphalangeal thumb is a thumb with three phalanges. The thumb often appears long and fingerlike, and can sometimes be in the same plane as the other fingers. Anatomically, the extra phalanx can have different shapes. Several classification systems have been used, but the simplest and most often used is the Wood (1976) classification by the shape of the extra phalanx. If the extra phalanx is triangularly shaped it is classified as a type I. Type II has a rectangular shaped extra phalanx but it has not developed as a full phalanx. Type III is a full extra phalanx.
A triphalangeal thumb is a thumb with three phalanges. The thumb often appears long and
fingerlike, and can sometimes be in the same plane as the other fingers. Anatomically, the
extra phalanx can have different shapes. Several classification systems have been used, but
the simplest and most often used is the Wood (1976) classification by the shape of the extra
phalanx. If the extra phalanx is triangularly shaped it is classified as a type I. Type II
has a rectangular shaped extra phalanx but it has not developed as a full phalanx. Type III
is a full extra phalanx.
Different treatment strategies have been developed based on the type of triphalangeal thumb.
This project looks specifically at type I, or a delta phalanx. The goals of surgery in any
type are to reconstruct the anatomic deformity with a stable, functional thumb while
providing an acceptable appearance.
There is no consensus on how triphalangeal thumbs with a delta phalanx should be treated.
Bunnell and Campbell in the 1940s advocated doing no surgery at all. Milch advocated
excising the abnormal phalanx in the pediatric population but supporting non-operative
treatment for the adult population. A potential unwanted result of excision has been an
angulated joint. Buck-Gramcko proposed that excision of the delta phalanx combined with
ligament reconstruction could give a better result than with excision alone.
Hovius recommended different treatment based on the age of presentation. For patients less
than 6 years, he advocated excision of a transverse oval piece of skin, resection of the
extra phalanx with reconstruction of the radial collateral ligament at the new IP joint, and
lengthening of the ulnar collateral ligament. For patients older than 6 years, he advocates
partial resection of the extra phalanx with correction of the angle and arthrodesis of the
DIP joint. Usually, collateral ligament reconstruction is not necessary in these cases.
Horii et al reviewed 13 type I delta triphalangeal thumbs with no associated hand
abnormalities. Surgical treatment for these patients consisted of excision of an accessory
phalanx and the repair of the collateral ligament. The IP joint was temporarily fixed with
Kirschner wires for 4-6 weeks. Mean follow-up was 8.9 years. All patients were satisfied
with the improvement in appearance. The mean IP joint motion was 54 degrees. No patients
complained of instability or pain in the IP joint. Only one patient had ten degrees of
lateral bending. They recommend operating on these patients between ages 1-2 years, when the
phalangeal epiphyses becomes clear. They felt that earlier excision allows for better joint
adaptation. The children also will learn how to use their hands correctly.
Recently it has been debated that it is beneficial to wait to operate on these children
until they are older, and their bones and joints have matured. At that point, an osteotomy
could be performed. Although these results have not been published yet, several
well-respected hand surgeons have concluded that their outcomes have been better on patients
who have had delayed surgery.
In our institutions, children generally have their thumb reconstructed using a delta phalanx
excision with repair of the ligament around 1 to 2 years.
;
Observational Model: Cohort