Severe Atrophy of the Edentulous Mandible Clinical Trial
— ROM-OHIP-EDOfficial title:
Patient Satisfaction With the Use of Three Different Systems as Retention for Implant Supported Mandibular Overdentures.
Verified date | February 2015 |
Source | Concordia Dent Srl |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Romania: Ministry of Public Health |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of the study is:
1. To validate the Romanian translation of OHIP-EDENT (Oral Health Impact Profile in
Edentulous Adults), the short form of OHIP (Oral Health Impact Profile) developed by
Allen and Locker for edentulous adults. The OHIP questionnaire is an efficient
instrument for assessment of OHRQoL - Oral Health-Related Quality of Life.
2. To compare satisfaction of 69 fully mandibular edentulous patients rehabilitated with
implant-supported overdentures with three different types of retention: Retentive
Anchors, Magnets, Locator.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 69 |
Est. completion date | February 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 21 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Fully mandibular edentulous patients - Complains about the stability of the existing mandibular denture satisfactory from a technical point of view. - Acceptance of a mandibular over-denture retained by two endosseous implants. - Patients agree to a 5-year follow-up period. Exclusion Criteria: - Insufficient bone volume (height and with) for inserting at least a 10 mm implant (Ø 4,1). - Angle class II relationship. - Physical severe consideration that will affect the minimal invasive surgical procedure or constitute a hindrance for a 5-year follow-up. - History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region. - History of pre-prosthetic surgery (including bone graft procedures) or previous oral implants. |
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Romania | Concordia Dent Clinic | Bucharest |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Concordia Dent Srl | ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland |
Romania,
Assad AS, Abd El-Dayem MA, Badawy MM. Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures. Implant Dent. 2004 Dec;13(4):386-94. — View Citation
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. Review. — View Citation
Chan MF, Johnston C, Howell RA, Cawood JI. Prosthetic management of the atrophic mandible using endosseous implants and overdentures: a six year review. Br Dent J. 1995 Nov 11;179(9):329-37. — View Citation
Davis DM, Packer ME. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 May-Jun;12(3):222-9. — View Citation
Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):401-10. — View Citation
Weingart D, ten Bruggenkate CM. Treatment of fully edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:69-82. Review. — View Citation
Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LC, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):535-43. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | OHIP-EDENT linguistic and cultural adaptation in Romanian | Steps for validation: linguistic and cultural adaptation of the original instrument to Romanian; pilot study to assess face and content validity; main study to assess the reliability and construct validity. OHIP-EDENT questionnaire includes 19-items addressing masticatory capacity, pleasure of eating, level of comfort, and relationship among others while wearing the prosthesis and detects the impact of oral health in the quality of life of edentulous adults wearing total prosthesis. Response categories:4=very often; 3=fairly often; 2=occasionally; 1=hardly ever; 0=never/don't know. |
Two-weeks | No |
Secondary | Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the use of three different systems as retention for implant supported mandibular overdentures. | Patient satisfaction is assessed with the use of OHIP-EDENT questionnaire validated in Romanian language. The questionnaire is administrated initial (before surgery for assessing patient satisfaction with the original denture), after 6 months of implant over-denture insertion (T) and at 1,3 and 5-year follow-up (T1, T3, T5). The means scores will be calculated. Lower scores represents a good perception of the oral conditions, good satisfaction level and good masticatory capacity. |
5 years | No |