Mild to Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss Clinical Trial
Official title:
Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System Clinical Trial U.S. Pivotal Trial
| NCT number | NCT01092910 |
| Other study ID # | 0204 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | January 2008 |
| Est. completion date | August 2010 |
| Verified date | January 2016 |
| Source | Envoy Medical Corporation |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System in subjects suffering from mild to severe hearing loss.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 57 |
| Est. completion date | August 2010 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 2009 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subject is 18 years old - Subject understands the nature of the procedure and has signed the Subject Informed Consent Form prior to the procedure - Subject is willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and understands the audiological test procedures and use of the Esteem System. - Subject has mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss between 500 and 4000 Hz in the ear to be implanted with pure tone air-conduction threshold levels within the limits of a Hearing Aid (HA) as follow: Freq (Hz) 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 LL* (dB HL) 30 35 35 35 35 UL* (dB HL) 100 100 100 100 100 *LL = Lower Level; UL = Upper Level - Subject's air-bone gap is no greater than 10 dB at 4 of the 5 following frequencies: 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz. - Subject has an unaided maximum word recognition score of greater than or equal to 60% with recorded delivery using a phonetically balanced word list at SRT + 40 dB or at maximum tolerable presentation level. - Subject is a current user of a properly functioning and appropriately fit hearing aid. This is defined as the subject has used this aid for at least four (4) hours (average) per day (in the ear to be implanted) for at least three (3) months for a new aid or one (1) month for an adjusted aid. - Subject's hearing aid, in the ear to be implanted, shall appropriately fit optimally. - Subject has normally functioning eustachian tube - Subject has normal tympanic membrane - Subject has a normal middle ear anatomy - Subject has adequate space for Esteem System implant determined via fine cut temporal bone CT scan - Subject is a native speaker of the English language. - Subject is a hearing aid user in the ear to be implanted. Exclusion Criteria: - Subject has a history of post-adolescent chronic middle ear infections, inner ear disorders or recurring vertigo requiring treatment, disorders such as mastoiditis, Hydrops or Meniere's syndrome or disease - Subject has a history of otitis externa or eczema for the outer ear canal and the investigator believes this will affect the Esteem System implantation - Subject has cholesteatoma or destructive middle ear disease - Subject has life expectancy of two (2) years due to other medical conditions - Subject has retrocochlear or central auditory disorders - Subject is known to be suffering from any psychological, developmental, physical, or emotional disorder that the investigator feels would interfere with the surgery or follow-up testing - Subject has a known history of fluctuating air conduction and/or bone conduction hearing loss over a one-year period of 15 dB in either direction at 2 or more frequencies (from 500 - 4000 Hz) - Subject has sudden hearing loss due to unknown cause - Subject has a history of disabling tinnitus, defined as tinnitus which required treatment. - Subject is unable to adequately perform audiological testing - Subject has a medical condition or undergoing a treatment that may affect healing and the investigator does not believe the subject is a good candidate for the trial. - Subject has diabetes that is not well controlled with medication or diet and the investigator does not believe in his best medical judgment that the subject would be a good candidate for the trial - Subject is pregnant at the time of device implant - Subject has a history of keloid formation - Subject has known hypersensitivity to silicone rubber, polyurethane, stainless steel, titanium and/or gold |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Lahey Clinic, Inc. | Burlington | Massachusetts |
| United States | Surgical Care Affiliates | Greensboro | North Carolina |
| United States | The Ear Center of Greensboro | Greensboro | North Carolina |
| United States | Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian | Newport Beach | California |
| United States | Shohet Ear Associates | Newport Beach | California |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Envoy Medical Corporation |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | SRT Change | Comparison of the speech reception threshold (SRT) using the Esteem System as compared to the pre-implant aided condition | 4 Months Post Activation | |
| Primary | SRT Change | Comparison of the speech reception threshold (SRT) using the Esteem System as compared to the pre-implant aided condition | 10 Months Post-Activation | |
| Primary | Word Recognition Score Change | Comparison of the word recognition score using the Esteem compared to the pre-implant aided condition | 4 Months Post Activation | |
| Primary | Word Recognition Score Change | Comparison of the word recognition score using the Esteem compared to the pre-implant aided condition | 10 Months Post Activation | |
| Primary | SADEs | The incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE) and the incidence rate of device failures and replacements | 10 Months Post-Activation | |
| Primary | Assessment of Cochlear Function at 4-months and 10-months Post-activation, as Evidenced by Bone-conduction (BC) Thresholds. | Comparison of bone conduction thresholds at the 4-month and 10-month post-activation follow-up, relative to the pre-implant baseline bone conduction thresholds. Lower thresholds represent better (more sensitive) outcomes. | Baseline, 4-, and 10-Months Post-Activation | |
| Secondary | Comparisons of Change in Global Score on Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) at 4 Months and at 10 Months Post-activation, Relative to Pre-implant Baseline Score | To assess whether the Esteem System improves Quality-of-Life, when compared to the baseline aided condition (pre-implant) as shown by the global Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) score. The APHAB is a 24-item self-assessment inventory in which patients report the amount of trouble they are having with communication in various everyday situations using a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less difficulty (or increased benefit). The Global Score is the average of 3 subscales. Scores reported here are calculated by comparing the patient's reported difficulty in the baseline "unaided" condition with their amount of difficulty when using amplification (hearing aids or implant) -- i.e. Global Scores at pre-implant baseline subtracted from scores at aided baseline and at 4 and 10 months post-implant. Positive numbers denote increased benefit relative to unaided baseline, and the higher the number, the greater the benefit. |
4 and 10 Months Post-Activation | |
| Secondary | Scores on Esteem Questionnaire | To gain subject feedback on the use of the Esteem System relative to their pre-implant hearing aid (aided condition) as shown by the (unvalidated) Esteem Questionnaire. Subjects completed a 7-item questionnaire rating various subjective attributes concerning their experience with Esteem as compared to their previous hearing aid. Ratings were on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is "much worse," 3 is the same and 5 is "much better." Reported here are proportions of participants responding to each score (1 to 5) on the scale, for average scores across all 7 items for each subject. | 4 and 10 Months Post Activation | |
| Secondary | Change in Pure Tone Average (PTA) at 4 Months, Relative to Baseline Pre-implant | For each subject, the 4-month post-activation Air Conduction PTA (average of thresholds at three frequencies: 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) was compared to the baseline unaided PTA. A negative mean difference (in dB) from baseline indicates improved hearing sensitivity with the Esteem, relative to baseline. | 4 Months Post Activation | |
| Secondary | Difference in QuickSIN (Quick Speech-In-Noise Test) Score at 4 Months Relative to Baseline Aided Condition | The Quick-SIN is a test of sentence recognition in varying levels of background noise. The score achieved is termed "SNR loss," and a higher score indicates poorer performance on the test. "SNR Loss" is defined as the dB increase in signal-to-noise ratio required by a hearing-impaired person to understand speech in noise, compared to someone with normal hearing. (The range of possible scores is -4.5 to 25.5, with lower scores indicating better performance.) For this study, baseline scores for each subject are subtracted from 4 month scores, providing a difference score. The mean difference across subjects is reported here, with 0 meaning no change and a negative difference indicating better performance with Esteem, compared to the pre-implant aided condition. | 4 Months Post Activation |