Suspected Eosinophilic Esophagitis Clinical Trial
— EOEOfficial title:
Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial With Sham Comparing Standard Therapy With or Without Esophageal Dilatation in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Verified date | October 2017 |
Source | Vanderbilt University Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is for patients who have had a food impaction and/or difficulty swallowing, who
are scheduled to have endoscopy, biopsy and possibly dilatation (stretching) of the
esophagus.
Standard treatment for people who have food impaction and difficulty swallowing is endoscopy
to view the esophagus, tissue biopsies of the lining of the esophagus for diagnosis, and drug
therapy including steroids and drugs used to treat reflux disease. Early dilatation or
stretching of the esophagus may be done at this time but not always. Some doctors prefer to
wait and see if the drugs are affective.
It is not known if dilating the esophagus early in treatment adds benefit. Therefore, we are
doing this study to compare the two methods of treatment. We will compare two groups: one
group will have dilatation performed during the first endoscopy and one group will not have
dilatation performed during endoscopy. We will see if dilatation helps prevent food impaction
and improves swallowing.
Another purpose of this study is to learn more about the causes of swallowing problems, thus
extra biopsies will be taken of the esophagus and store them for future research.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | December 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and female volunteers =18 years old. 2. Patients with known or suspected Eosinophilic Esophagitis. 3. Patients undergoing upper endoscopy for recent food impaction or complaint of dysphagia. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Use of oral corticosteroids. 2. Significant medical conditions that in the investigator's judgment would compromise the subject's health and safety. 3. Contraindication to esophageal dilation based on investigator's judgment. 4. Esophageal motility abnormalities not thought to be related to Eosinophilic Esophagitis. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Vanderbilt Unversity Medical Center Department of Gastroenterology | Nashville | Tennessee |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Vanderbilt University | Takeda |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in Dysphagia Score in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EE) | Dysphagia Scores: 0 = able to eat normal diet / no dysphagia. = able to swallow some solid foods = able to swallow only semi solid foods = able to swallow liquids only = unable to swallow anything / total dysphagia |
60 days | |
Secondary | Immunological Assessment Into the Etiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis | 60 days |