Diagnostic or Therapeutic Laparoscopy Clinical Trial
— CuldoOfficial title:
A Preliminary Study Utilizing a Flexible Endoscope for Pelvic Culdoscopy
| Verified date | September 2013 |
| Source | University of Arkansas |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
| Study type | Observational |
The culdoscopic approach will allow for equal or better visualization of female pelvic structures
| Status | Terminated |
| Enrollment | 2 |
| Est. completion date | July 2013 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 2013 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | Female |
| Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Female - Ages 18 to 70 years old - Ability to understand and give informed consent - Scheduled for diagnostic or therapeutic laparoscopy for a clinical indication - Presence of a uterus and at least one ovary at the initiation of the procedure Exclusion Criteria: - Documented culdesac mass - Inability to tolerate anesthesia - Documentation of positive urine pregnancy test - History of prior pelvic radiation - Scheduled for emergency laparoscopy - Any other medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigative team, will interfere with the ability of the participant to safely complete the study - History of significant non-compliance with previous therapy or unwillingness to return for follow up visits - Prior hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy |
N/A
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences | Little Rock | Arkansas |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Arkansas |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Visualization of female pelvic structures using a flexible endoscope and a standard laparoscope will be compared. | 02/2010 | No | |
| Secondary | Complications related to the procedures will be recorded and, if possible, attributed to one of the two techniques. If feasible, a comparison will be made between complications attributable to each approach. | 02/2010 | No |