Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00642876
Other study ID # PRESTIGE®
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 2002
Est. completion date May 2013

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ACD in the single level surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. The primary follow-up information obtained from this clinical investigation are used to support a PMA application for the ACD.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 541
Est. completion date May 2013
Est. primary completion date July 2006
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: All patients participating in this study must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: 1. Cervical degenerative disc disease defined as: intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with at least one of the following items producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression which is documented by patient history (e.g., neck and/or arm pain], functional deficit, and/or neurological deficit, and radiographic studies (e.g., CT, MRI, x-rays, etc). 1. herniated disc; 2. osteophyte formation; 2. One cervical level requiring surgical treatment; 3. C3-C4 disc to C6-C7 disc level of involvement; 4. Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for approximately six weeks or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of continued non-operative management; 5. No previous surgical intervention at the involved level or any subsequent, planned/staged surgical procedure at the involved or adjacent level(s); 6. Is at least 18 years of age, inclusive, at the time of surgery; 7. Preoperative Neck Disability Index score > or = 30; 8. Has a preoperative neck pain score of > 20 based on the Preoperative Neck and Arm Pain Questionnaire. 9. If of child-bearing potential, patient is not pregnant at the time of surgery; 10. Is willing to comply with the study plan and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form. Exclusion Criteria: A patient meeting any of the following criteria is to be excluded from the study: 1. Has a cervical spinal condition other than symptomatic cervical disc disease requiring surgical treatment at the involved level; 2. Documented or diagnosed cervical instability defined by dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs showing: 1. Sagittal plane translation > 3.5 mm or; 2. Sagittal plane angulation > 20. 3. More than one cervical level requiring surgical treatment; 4. Has a fused level adjacent to the level to be treated; 5. Has severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies; 6. Previous surgical intervention at the involved level; 7. Has been previously diagnosed with osteopenia or osteomalacia; 8. Has any of the following that may be associated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (if Yes to any of the below risk factors, a DEXA Scan will be required to determine eligibility): 1. Postmenopausal Non-Black female over 60 years of age and weighs less than 140 pounds. 2. Postmenopausal female that has sustained a non-traumatic hip, spine, or wrist fracture. 3. Male over the age of 70. 4. Male over the age of 60 that has sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture. If the level of BMD is a T score of -3.5 or a T score of -2.5 with vertebral crush fracture, then the patient is excluded from the study. 9. Has presence of spinal metastases; 10. Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic; 11. Has severe insulin dependent diabetes; 12. Has chronic or acute renal failure or prior history of renal disease; 13. Has fever (temperature > 101 F oral) at the time of surgery; 14. Has a documented allergy or intolerance to stainless steel, titanium, or a titanium alloy; 15. Is mentally incompetent. (If questionable, obtain psychiatric consult); 16. Is a prisoner; 17. Is pregnant; 18. Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse; 19. Has received drugs which may interfere with bone metabolism within two weeks prior to the planned date of spinal surgery (e.g., steroids or methotrexate), excluding routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs; 20. Has a history of an endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's Disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, or osteogenesis imperfecta); 21. Has a condition that requires postoperative medications that interfere with the stability of the implant or fusion, such as steroids. (This does not include low dose aspirin for prophylactic anticoagulation and routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs); 22. Has received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to implantation surgery or such treatment is planned during the16 weeks following Artificial Cervical Disc implantation.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System
The patients that received the control treatment underwent a single level anterior cervical fusion procedure involving allograft bone and the ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System.
PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc
The PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc is a stainless steel device that was inserted into the intervertebral disc space. The device is composed of two metal plates that interface via a ball and socket mechanism permitting segmental spinal motion.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Atlanta Brain and Spine Care Atlanta Georgia
United States Emory Orthop and Spine Center Atlanta Georgia
United States Neurosurgery Ass, P.A. Baltimore Maryland
United States Baton Rouge Orth Clinic Baton Rouge Louisiana
United States Surgical Neurology New Hampshire Neurospine Institute Bedford New Hampshire
United States Central Illinois Neuroscience Bloomington Illinois
United States Central Wyoming Neurosurgery Casper Wyoming
United States Wyoming Brain and Spine Institute Casper Wyoming
United States Spine Surgery Associates Chattanooga Tennessee
United States The Ortho Center of St. Louis Chesterfield Missouri
United States Hughston Clinic Columbus Georgia
United States Center of Neurosciences Orthopedics & Spine, P.C. Dakota Dunes South Dakota
United States North Alabama Neurological Huntsville Alabama
United States Orthoindy Indianapolis Indiana
United States University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa
United States Westphal Group Lancaster Pennsylvania
United States University of Wisconsin Medical School Madison Wisconsin
United States Semmes Murphey Memphis Tennessee
United States Montgomery Neurosurgical Montgomery Alabama
United States Howell Allen Clinic Nashville Tennessee
United States Loyola University Medical Center Oak Park Illinois
United States Brain and Spine Center of Texas Plano Texas
United States Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon
United States Neurosugical Associates, PC Richmond Virginia
United States University of California, Davis Sacramento California
United States The Spine Institute Santa Monica California
United States Inland Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, P.S. Spokane Washington
United States Springfield Neurological Institute Springfield Missouri
United States Buffalo Neurosurgery Group West Seneca New York
United States Orlando Neurosurgery Winter Park Florida
United States Michigan Brain & Spine Institute Ypsilanti Michigan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (2)

Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):308-18. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09513. — View Citation

Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Mar;6(3):198-209. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The primary endpoint is overall success, which consists of NDI score, neuro status success, with/without FSU disc ht success, no serious AE classified as "implant/surgical procedure associated", and no secondary surgical procedure classified as failure 24 months
Secondary The secondary outcomes are radiographic success, medical outcomes SF-36 patient survey (MCS & PCS) success, neck pain status, arm pain status, patient satisfaction, patient global perceived effect, gait assessment, foraminal compression test 24 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01491399 - INFUSE™ BONE GRAFT/CORNERSTONE-SR™ Allograft Ring/ATLANTIS™ Anterior Cervical Plate- Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT00875810 - PRESTIGE Observational Study N/A
Terminated NCT01491477 - INFUSE ® Bone Graft/CORNERSTONE-SR® Allograft Ring/ATLANTIS® Anterior Cervical Plate System Pivotal Trial N/A