Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00556244
Other study ID # 200704053M
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 1/Phase 2
First received November 8, 2007
Last updated November 8, 2007
Start date April 2007
Est. completion date November 2007

Study information

Verified date April 2007
Source National Taiwan University Hospital
Contact Pei-yao Chang, M.D.
Phone 886-2-23123456
Email peiyao@seed.net.tw
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Taiwan: Department of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Internal limiting membrane peeling in diabetic vitrectomy will help prevent postoperative epiretinal membrane formation


Description:

Progressive fibrovascular proliferation may occur despite appropriate panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic patients. Fibrovascular proliferation may lead to persistent or recurrent vitreous hemorrhage, macular traction, or traction macular detachment, and becomes a major indication for vitrectomy.1 During the past 25 years, anatomical and visual results of vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy have improved as a result of improved understanding of the pathoanatomy and improvements in surgical instrumentation.2-5 Although anatomical success is high after complete vitrectomy, recurrent epiretinal membrane may cause macular thickening, cysts formation, preventing good functional outcome.6 An epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a non-vascular cellular membrane that may cause symptomatic visual disturbances due to retinal wrinkling and distortion.7 These epiretinal membranes have been found to be composed of fibroblasts, glial cells, macrophages, myofiboblasts, nad retinal pigment epithelial cells.8-9 Studies have suggested removal of internal limiting membrane (ILM) may decrease the likelihood of post-operative ERM formation in cases of diabetic macular edema and idiopathic ERM. It is postulated that removal of the ILM removes the scaffold upon which myofibroblasts would proliferate.10 Efficacy of vitrectomy including removal of ILM was mostly described as facilitating resolution of diffuse diabetic macular edema11 and improvement of visual acuity or in macular hole surgery in diabetic patients.12However, it is unknown if removal of ILM during vitreoretinal surgery in diabetic patients with active fibrovascular proliferation is useful in preventing postoperative ERM formation. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation and visual outcome in diabetic patients with active fibrovascular proliferation who underwent vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date November 2007
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 30 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- active fibrovascular proliferation with or without tractional detachment

- previous pan-retinal photocoagulation at least 3 months before

Exclusion Criteria:

- biomicroscopic evidence of macular hole

- combination of tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

- location of fibrovascular proliferation anterior to the equator

- major ocular surgery history(including, scleral buckle, glaucoma filter, cornea transplant, vitreoretinal surgery etc

- the presence of other ocular conditions such as glaucoma, uveitis, or other ocular inflammatory diseases.

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Who Have Active Fibrovascular Proliferation

Intervention

Procedure:
ILM peeling
ILM maculorhexis is initiated using scraper and completed using a 25-gauge Synergetics (St. Louis, MO) forceps.

Locations

Country Name City State
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Taiwan University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Snellen BCVA and epiretinal membrane formation measured with OCT within 6 months after the surgery
Secondary central macular thickness measured bt OCT within 6 months after the surgery