Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients

Indications for a Total Hip Prosthesis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00285129
• Other study ID #: 2004/338
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: January 31, 2006
• Last updated: December 19, 2007
• Start date: January 2004
• Est. completion date: December 2004

Study information

• Verified date: December 2007
• Source: University Hospital, Ghent
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Belgium: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Comparison of the functional result and speed of rehabilitation between two types of hip prostheses: primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 400
• Est. completion date: December 2004
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Total hip replacement

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Indications for a Total Hip Prosthesis

Intervention

Device:
• ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	University Hospital Ghent	Ghent

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Hospital, Ghent

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Functional result
Primary	Speed of rehabilitation

External Links

•   Website University Hospital Ghent