Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00200031
Other study ID # 4348
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received September 12, 2005
Last updated July 24, 2008
Start date July 2005
Est. completion date April 2006

Study information

Verified date July 2008
Source MedtronicNeuro
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

A study to examine the impact that Interstim Therapy for Urinary Control has on health care utilization and costs within a health care system and the satisfaction with treatment expressed by patients using this therapy.


Description:

A retrospective administrative data analysis combined with a prospective health related quality of life/satisfaction with treatment survey designed to examine the impact that Interstim Therapy for Urinary Control has had on health care utilization and costs for the Kaiser Permanente system and the satisfaction with treatment expressed by patients using this therapy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date April 2006
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Patients implanted with an Interstim Therapy for Urinary Control or undergoing test stimulation for potential placement of Interstim Therapy during the period of June 1, 2002 through June 30, 2004 and who are enrolled with Kaiser-Permanente of Southern California.

Study Design

N/A


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Interstim therapy


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Southern California Permanente Medical Group Los Angeles California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
MedtronicNeuro

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Aboseif SR, Kim DH, Rieder JM, Rhee EY, Menefee SA, Kaswick JR, Ree MH. Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1069-73; discussion 1073-4. — View Citation