Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the neurophysiological contributors to muscle function following ACL Reconstruction and the influence of motor control biofeedback exercise on measures of muscle function. The research team hypothesizes that the application of motor biofeedback will increase cortical excitability of the quadriceps compared to the passive movement of the knee.

This is a single session cross-over intervention study with a 1-week washout period between treatment arms.


Clinical Trial Description

1. Pre-treatment neuromuscular assessment Cortical Active Motor Threshed We will measure motor evoked potentials with the use of a Transcranial magnetic stimulator (MagStim model 200, Magstim Co., Ltd., Wales, UK). The MagStim has FDA 510K Clearance for stimulation of peripheral nerves.

- The participant will be asked to sit in the dynamometer (Biodex, System 3) in knee extension at 90 degrees of knee flexion.

- EMG electrodes will be placed on the distal quadriceps

o Local shaving, debridement, and cleaning will be done prior if necessary

- A non-latex swim cap will be placed on the participants head for investigator's measurements

- Briefly, a magnetic field with a maximum value of 2.2 Tesla will be introduced to the scalp at a location in the pre-motor cortex that corresponds to the quadriceps. Single pulse stimulations will be delivered with no less than 10 seconds between stimulations (maximum = 0.1 Hz).

- When the magnetic field is received at the premotor cortex at the appropriate area, a motor signal is sent to the quadriceps. We will record this signal with surface EMG electrodes that are on the quadriceps.

- The participant will be asked to extend their leg to match a force equivalent to 5% MVIC. Feedback will be provided to the participant to provide such force.

- Stimulation of the TMS will happen once every ten seconds until the Active Motor Threshold was found by the investigator.

- The motor evoked potential measured by the quadriceps will be recorded at 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, and 150% of the patients Active motor threshold.

2. Patient randomization

- The patient is then randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. 1) Visuomotor Therapy or 2) Passive Motion

3. Perform Randomized Treatment Visuomotor Therapy

- The participant will sit in the Biodex chair with the tested limb secured in the dynamometer

- The participant will receive live real-time biofeedback of their knee force output (no more than 30% of maximum force)

- The participant will aim to match their force output to a target threshold presented on the screen.

- The participant will complete 10 60-second trials of this exercise with a 30 second rest between each trial.

OR

Passive Motion

- The participant will sit in the Biodex chair with the tested limb secured in the dynamometer

- The dynamometer will passively move the patients lower limb between 80 to 120 degrees of knee flexion

- The participant will be asked to relax for the duration of testing - The participant will complete 10 60-second trials of this exercise with a 30 second rest between each trial.

4. Reassess Neuromuscular outcome (Step 1)

5. 1-week washout period

6. Repeat Steps 1 through 4 but the patient receives the cross-over arm intervention ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04495075
Study type Interventional
Source University of Virginia
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date March 1, 2019
Completion date March 1, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04062578 - Effects Provided by a Physiotherapy Treatment Preventing Lower Extremity Injuries in Female Football Players N/A
Recruiting NCT05461326 - Quadriceps Tendon Versus Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction RCT N/A
Completed NCT05109871 - Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque N/A
Completed NCT05504018 - Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of ACL Reconstruction Results N/A
Recruiting NCT06185231 - Investigation of the Effects of Vibration Therapy on Pain, Functionality, and Proprioception After ACL Injury N/A
Recruiting NCT03968913 - Biologic Therapy to Prevent Osteoarthritis After ACL Injury Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04408690 - Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06222814 - Evaluation of the Results of Two Different Methods in Management of Antero-lateral Instability of the Knee N/A
Recruiting NCT05614297 - Agreement Between Rolimeter and Lachmeter in Patients With ACL Injury
Active, not recruiting NCT05184023 - The Effect of PEMF for Patients With Quadriceps Muscle Weakness After ACLR N/A
Completed NCT04906538 - Objective Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Internal Suture Augmentation Technique Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05014009 - The Influence of Neuromuscular Training on Whole-body Movement Strategies and Knee Mechanics During Change-of-direction Tasks in Sports Science Students N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06083818 - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Protocol in Female Football Players With Dynamic Knee Valgus N/A
Recruiting NCT05584020 - Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury N/A
Completed NCT04580290 - Jewel ACL Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Recruiting NCT04888052 - Prolonged Preoperative Rehabilitation in ACL Rupture. N/A
Recruiting NCT06430775 - Exploring Prolonged AMR in ACL Reconstructed Patients
Not yet recruiting NCT05580133 - All-Inside Single-Bundle for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Full Thickness of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Compared to the Six-strand-hamstring Autograft (ACL)
Recruiting NCT04162613 - Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
Not yet recruiting NCT05619393 - Comparison of Kinematic Movements Between ACL Deficiency With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy People N/A