Comparison of BiCision® Versus UltraCision® During Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LASH)

Benign Uterine Conditions Clinical Trial

Official title: Comparison of BiCision® Versus UltraCision® During Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LASH): A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Non-inferiority in Vivo Human Study.

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study is the evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the new, CE-certified thermofu-sion and dissection instrument BiCision® in comparison with the long established Ultracision® Har-monic Scalpel(Ethicon)during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH).

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Benign Uterine Conditions
• Blood Coagulation Disorders
• Focus: Comparison of Two Instruments
• Hemostatic Disorders
• Uterine Bleeding Disorders
• Uterine Hemorrhage

• NCT number: NCT01752725
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University Hospital Tuebingen
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 2011
• Completion date: April 2012