Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia Clinical Trial
Official title:
European Multicenter Study RF Versus Cryo in AVNRT: A Randomized Study Comparing Cryo-Energy vs. Radiofrequency-Energy Ablation Technique for AV Nodal Reentry Tachycardia (AVNRT)
In this randomized study, two energy sources for the ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia are compared: The standard technique of radiofrequency energy delivery is compared with the new approach of cryo-energy application.
The ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia with radiofrequency (RF) energy delivering
catheters is a standard procedure and in experienced EP laboratories, the safety and
efficacy of this approach is very high.
However, the potential complication of higher degree AV conduction block, requiring in some
instances implantation of a pacemaker, is a major drawback of this approach.
We want to compare in this randomized study the safety and efficacy of standard RF ablation
with the cryo-ablation technique. This relatively new technique is thought to offer more
safety concerning higher degree AV conduction block.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05705297 -
Intracardiac Echocardiography Guided Slow Pathway Cryoablation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05296954 -
Localization of Anatomical Structures Involved in Nodal Tachycardias by High Density Mapping.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00875914 -
Magnetically Navigated vs. Manually Guided Radiofrequency in Atrioventricular-node-reentry-tachycardia
|
Phase 4 |