View clinical trials related to Other.
Filter by:Cardiac device infections (CDI), especially pocket infections, are difficult to be diagnosed. Device pocket infections are not associated with elevated white blood cell count. CRP is only assoziated with a low sensitivity. The diagnosis of a local pocket infection is challenging and relies primarily on the clinical presentation. The prospective DIRT study identified procalcitonin (PCT) among 14 biomarkers as the most promising biomarker to aid the diagnosis of pocket infection. The study aims to validate the proposed PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml for the diagnosis of pocket infection
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of ALT-801 in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects with overweight and obese and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase III study originally designed to test the hypothesis that benralizumab will reduce exacerbation rates compared with placebo on top of standard-of-care therapy in adult patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis with eosinophilic inflammation (NCFB+EI). All patients who complete the double-blind treatment period (28 to 52 weeks depending on the timing of patient randomization and when the revised CSP version 3.0 becomes effective) on investigational product (IP) may be eligible to continue into an open-label extension (OLE) period during which all patients will receive benralizumab. The revised OLE period is intended to allow patients approximately 32 weeks of treatment with open label benralizumab (24 weeks followed by a FU visit 8 weeks after the last dose of IP for a total of approximately 32 weeks).
Investigators performed a prospective randomized controlled trial for comparing postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty.
Inhaled Beta-2 Agonist Versus Epinephrine For Treatment of Transient Tachypnea of Newborn: Randomized controlled trial to assess:
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of TTIP-first ventilation and to compare the efficacy of TTIP first ventilation with the current practice of mask-first ventilation
This trial consists of three parts, Part A, Part B, and Part C, and will evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a third booster injection of the multivalent vaccine BNT162b2 (B.1.1.7 + B.1.617.2), and the safety and immunogenicity of a third booster injection of the monovalent vaccine BNT162b2 (B.1.617.2) or BNT162b2 (B.1.1.7), in participants who have received two doses of the parent vaccine BNT162b2 at 30 µg, at least 6 months after the second dose of BNT162b2. It will also evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a three-dose regimen of BNT162b2 (B.1.1.7 + B.1.617.2) in participants who have not received prior Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. In addition, the safety and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 (B.1.1.529.1) or BNT162b2 given as a third or fourth vaccine dose to RNA COVID-19 vaccine-experienced participants with history of SARS-CoV-2 infection will be evaluated and contrasted with the natural immune response reached after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.
This study investigates the burden of intermittent catheterization in adult individuals with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) following spinal cord injury (SCI). Individuals will be recruited to compare two types of catheters. Each participant will use a non-hydrophilic catheter at one time point and a hydrophilic catheter at a different time point to perform intermittent catheterization. The order that participants use either a non-hydrophilic or a hydrophilic catheter will be determined randomly. The purpose of the study is to provide evidence for time spent on bladder management (performing intermittent catheterization) as well as consumer satisfaction on using both catheters.
Monocentric retrospective observational cohort study, using a consecutive series of patients hospitalized for FND from 2012 to 2015 in the neurology department A of the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital. During the discharge staff, an estimation of different prognostic factors had been performed in a consensual way by the medical team for all subjects. It is possible to calculate a score (POS) retrospectively from the data collected during the staff. The following items were evaluated on a Likert scale from 1 to 5: quality of adherence to the diagnosis, presence of a current medical treatment, presence of a similar history, duration of evolution of the disorders presented, ability to verbalize, presence of a social adaptation to the disorders, access to psychiatric care. The aim of the study will be to study the properties of the calculated score according to the evolution of the patients. The investigators will retrospectively collect information from the medical records. In addition, the evolution of the disorder since the initial hospitalization will be analyzed via a self-evaluation by the subjects and the study of the current medical records. The investigators will also collect information on the quality of life of the patients in the cohort and their perception of the disease at present. Using a Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) scale on FNDstatus, subjects will be classified into two groups by the two principal investigators (Dr. Vercueil, M. Bratanov): the first with a favorable evolution (disappearance of symptoms at the last follow-up, low health care consumption, favorable self-assessment of health status, persistence of symptoms at a low level of disability, satisfactory social and professional integration), and the second with an unfavorable evolution (persistence of symptoms at a disabling level, high health care consumption, unfavorable self-assessment of health status, lack of social and professional integration, multiple medical consultations). The prognostic properties of the POS score will be then studied in order to establish an ROC curve that will allow to classify patients in the two groups.
The aim of this study is to look at how the study medicine works in the body and how it is removed from the body. We are testing the study medicine to make a medicine that can help people lower their cholesterol level. Participants will either get 1. NNC0385-0434 (a potential new medicine) in one of three different doses: 15 mg, 40 mg, or 100 mg. 2. placebo (a dummy medicine which looks like the study medicine but without any medicine). Which treatment participants get is decided by chance. NNC0385-0434 is a new medicine and has not been approved by the Health Authorities (Centre for Drug Evaluation). Participants will get 1 tablet per day for 10 days. The tablet will be handed out by a study doctor or site staff at the clinic and the study will last between 62 and 98 days. Participants will have 7 clinic visits. One of these visits will be a 13-day, 12-night stay (V2) and the rest will be 1-day visits (V1 and V3 to V7). At all visits, except the information visit, participants will have blood drawn along with other clinical checks. Participants will be asked about their health, medical history and habits including mental health.