Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05171153 |
Other study ID # |
PIC108-21_HRJB |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
January 1, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
Quironsalud |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is considered a risk factor for the development of
osteoporosis, which leads to an increased risk of fractures. There is no data on bone quality
obtained with imaging techniques other than bone densitometry such as Trabecular Bone Score
(TBS), 3D bone densitometry (DXA-3D) or quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS). The TBS study can
provide information on bone microarchitecture in these patients, with TBS values expected to
be lower than those of subjects without IBD, with a decrease of up to 50 points in this
parameter.
Primary objective: to evaluate and compare TBS values in patients with IBD and in a control
group of volunteers without IBD or known metabolic bone pathology, adjusted for age, sex and
body mass index (BMI).
Secondary objectives: to evaluate and compare results in DEXA parameters, QUS, DEXA-3D,
biochemical parameters and FRAX data between patients with IBD and controls. To evaluate the
prevalence of vertebral fractures analyzed by VFA. As well as to evaluate the evolution in
one year of all these parameters in patients with IBD.
Prospective observational study with a cohort of patients with IBD and another of volunteers
without IBD or metabolic bone pathology, adjusted for age, sex and BMI. Baseline bone quality
data will be analyzed by bone densitometry, TBS, DEXA-3D and QUS, fractures assessed by VFA
and bone remodeling markers in both cohorts. Subsequently, a one-year analysis of the
parameters of the IBD cohort will be performed.
Description:
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is considered a risk factor for the development of
osteoporosis, which leads to an increased risk of fractures. There is no data on bone quality
obtained with imaging techniques other than bone densitometry such as Trabecular Bone Score
(TBS), 3D bone densitometry (DXA-3D) or quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS).
HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease present an alteration in
bone quality that can be assessed by TBS, with TBS values expected to be lower than those of
subjects without IBD or known bone pathology, with a decrease of up to 50 points in this
parameter.
Primary Objective : to evaluate and compare the values of the trabecular bone score (TBS), a
surrogate marker of bone quality, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and in a
control group of volunteers without IBD or known metabolic bone pathology, recruited in the
consultations of the Endocrinology and Nutrition, Digestive System and Rheumatology
departments of the Hospital Ruber Juan Bravo during routine health control visits, adjusted
for age, sex and body mass index (BMI).
Secondary Objectives
1. To compare bone mineral density (BMD) values measured by dual energy X-ray
absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (anteroposterior and lateral) and proximal
femur in patients with IBD with those of a control group of subjects adjusted for age,
sex and BMI.
2. To compare the ultrasound velocity and attenuation parameters (BUA and SOS) obtained by
quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus (QUS) in patients with IBD with those of a
control group of subjects adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
3. To analyse the prevalence and severity of vertebral fractures using the Vertebral
Fracture Assessment (VFA) software of lateral DXA in patients with IBD compared to a
control group adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
4. To correlate the TBS results with the ultrasound velocity and attenuation parameters
(BUA and SOS) obtained with QUS.
5. To correlate TBS results with BMD parameters measured by DXA in the lumbar spine
(anteroposterior and lateral) and in the proximal femur.
6. To compare biochemical markers of bone remodelling [carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type
I collagen (ß-CTx Crosslaps) and N-terminal propeptide of type I protocolagen (P1NP)] in
patients with IBD with a control group of subjects adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
7. To correlate baseline levels of biochemical markers of bone remodelling with the results
of: a) BMD obtained with DXA in the lumbar spine (anteroposterior and lateral) and in
the proximal femur, b) TBS values and c) parameters obtained with QUS.
8. To assess the absolute 10-year risk of major fractures and hip fractures using the FRAX
tool, in subjects with IBD. To correlate the absolute risk of fractures with the TBS and
QUS values.
9. To evaluate the effect of adjusting the FRAX tool by including TBS values for the
calculation of the absolute risk of major and hip fractures.
10. To analyse the evolution of bone microarchitecture parameters measured by TBS, bone
ultrasound parameters of ultrasound velocity and attenuation, BMD in the lumbar spine
(anteroposterior and lateral) and in the proximal femur and biochemical markers of bone
remodelling in patients with IBD after one year of follow-up.
11. To analyse the discriminative capacity for the diagnosis of vertebral fractures
evaluated with VFA of the TBS and QUS values, compared with the BMD values obtained in
lumbar DXA (anteroposterior and lateral) in patients with IBD.
12. To compare volumetric BMD parameters measured by 3D bone densitometry (DXA-3D) of the
hip in patients with IBD with a control group of subjects adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
13. To correlate bone quality parameters measured by TBS and QUS with volumetric BMD
measured by 3D DXA-3D in the hip.
14. To evaluate the effect of the different disease-modifying treatments (biologicals,
corticoids, etc.) on TBS values, bone ultrasound parameters, BMD values by conventional
DXA and DXA-3D in patients with IBD.
This study is organised into two sub-studies:
- Sub-study 1: observational, analytical, prospective, cross-sectional. Cohort-type study,
with a cohort of patients with IBD and a cohort of volunteers without IBD or known
metabolic bone pathology, recruited in the consultations of the Endocrinology and
Nutrition, Digestive System and Rheumatology departments of the Ruber Juan Bravo
Hospital during routine health control visits, adjusted for age, sex and body mass index
(BMI). The baseline data on bone quality measured by: a) bone densitometry in the lumbar
spine (anteroposterior and lateral), b) bone densitometry in the proximal femur, c) TBS,
d) DEXA-3D, e) calcaneal ultrasound, e) fractures assessed by VFA and f) biochemical
markers of bone remodelling in both cohorts will be analysed to respond to the primary
objective, secondary objectives 2 to 9 and exploratory objectives 11 to 14.
- Sub-study 2: observational, analytical, prospective and longitudinal, with one-year
follow-up of IBD patients only. Bone quality parameters measured by: a) bone
densitometry in the lumbar spine (anteroposterior and lateral), b) bone densitometry in
the proximal femur, c) TBS, d) DEXA-3D, e) calcaneal ultrasound, e) fractures assessed
by VFA and f) biochemical markers of bone remodelling will be analysed to respond to
secondary objective 10.