Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Does the Corin Optimised Positioning System Improve Clinical Outcome in Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Multi-centre, Two-arm Randomised Control Trial
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the Corin Optimised Positioning
System (Corin, U.K.) reduces the rate of hip dislocation at one-year post-operatively
compared with standard templating in patients undergoing total hip replacement.
The secondary objectives of this study are to determine whether the Corin Optimised
Positioning System (Corin, U.K.) improves functional outcomes, reduces length of hospital
stay, and reduces leg length discrepancy compared with standard templating in patients
undergoing total hip replacement.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease worldwide affecting an estimated 10% of
males and 18% of females over 60 years of age. The resultant pain and loss of function can be
debilitating and in developed countries represents a large socioeconomic burden, costing
between 1% and 2.5% of gross domestic product, which currently stands at over £1.5 trillion.
Total hip replacement (THR) is an effective treatment for end-stage hip arthritis; however,
demand for the procedure is growing rapidly, fuelled by an ageing population and the obesity
epidemic. In fact, rates of THR are predicted to rise 174% between 2005 and 2030. The current
commissioning environment in developed countries means that investment in iterative
improvements of existing THR implant designs are unlikely to yield either significant
benefits to patients or be supported by health funders. The two principle issues that concern
surgeons and patients are the longevity of implants and the ability of new technologies to
minimise complications such as dislocation and infection. The James-Lind Priorities Setting
Partnership, an internationally recognised patient-driven organisation, has recently
identified these pre-operative and intra-operative factors as targets for improving outcome
following hip and knee replacement.
One of the largest costs to healthcare providers following THR is dislocation. Although the
dislocation rate reported in Joint Registries is between 1 and 3% we know that this
significantly underestimates the true problem, as the majority of dislocation events are
managed with closed reduction and do not result in revision surgery. It is estimated that
dislocation is an order of magnitude more common than reported in Registry data. Literature
estimates indicate a true dislocation prevalence of 3 to 15%. The cost of dislocation is
significant as the problem is often recurrent, resulting in multiple hospital admissions. The
resulting average cost for each patient who suffers a THR dislocation is around £30,000.
The factors that influence dislocation are poorly understood. Conventional surgical wisdom
dictates that placing a cup in the Lewinneck 'safe zone' reduces both instability and wear. A
recent study of 9784 primary THRs, however, demonstrated that 58% of patients who suffered a
dislocation had implants judged to be in a safe position. This has led to suggestions that
the idea of one generic 'safe zone' may be misleading; instead, there is a unique optimum
position to place a cup in each patient undergoing THR, based on the unique and complex
interaction of the spine and pelvis of the individual. Thus, in some patients, whilst the
acetabular cup appears well positioned by conventional measures, pelvic tilt and spinal
position mean that the cup is placed in a position of instability during some activities.
The Corin Optimised Positioning System (OPS) is a novel platform, designed to enable delivery
of the prosthetic acetabular cup into an optimised position for every patient undergoing THR.
It comprises two stages: pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance.
Pre-operatively, patients undergo dynamic imaging (computed tomography scanning and X-ray
films). The information gained about the relative movements of a patient's spine, pelvis and
hips are used to create a personalized physiological profile. This enables calculation of the
optimized acetabular cup orientation for each individual. A unique physical guide (which
falls under the definition of a custom-made device in the Medical Device Directive) is then
created for each patient to fit precisely into the acetabular fossa, for use
intra-operatively. Intra-operatively, the Corin OPS uses laser alignment to aid the surgeon
in aligning the acetabular cup in the calculated optimised orientation. One laser is affixed
to an immovable pelvic screw; the other is attached to the reverse of the acetabular cup. The
target orientation of the cup is achieved when the two lasers are aligned.
The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy of the use of the Corin Optimised Positioning
System in reducing post-operative hip dislocation in patients undergoing total hip
arthroplasty by comparing it with current standard templating in total hip arthroplasty. All
total hip implants/components used in the study will be produced by Corin for uniformity and
have the required approvals. There is currently no evidence that this novel approach to
templating has an effect on dislocation rate. This project aims to provide evidence that this
new technique can improve outcomes for patients and have the potential to reduce the need for
complex, expensive revision surgery.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04657926 -
A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02536833 -
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03014037 -
Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05937542 -
A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
|
||
Completed |
NCT03644615 -
A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06061367 -
Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04976972 -
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05496205 -
A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03850665 -
Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02826902 -
Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04402502 -
Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02923700 -
Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04564053 -
Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05070871 -
A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05036174 -
Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02666443 -
Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02912429 -
Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02723929 -
Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02820766 -
Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02921594 -
Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties
|
N/A |