Osteoarthritis of the Knee Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Using COOLIEF™ Cooled Radiofrequency Probe to Create Lesions of the Genicular Nerves and Comparing a Single Injection of Hyaluronic Acid in the Management of Knee Pain
Verified date | September 2023 |
Source | Avanos Medical |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with osteoarthritis and knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) system compared to subjects receiving Hyaluronic Acid (HA). Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or HA injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 12 months post-CRFA, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Subjects randomized to the comparison (HA) group will have the option to cross-over to the neurotomy group after completing the 6-month endpoint assessment. They will be followed for an additional 6 months. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success. Subjects who were randomized to and received COOLIEF* as their initial treatment will have the option to add 2 additional visits at 6-month intervals, representing 18 and 24 months post initial treatment.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 177 |
Est. completion date | July 20, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | February 8, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 21 Years and older |
Eligibility | INCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Age = 21 years 2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures 3. Chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months that interferes with functional activities (for example, ambulation, prolonged standing, etc.) 4. Continued pain in the target knee despite at least 3 months of conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) 5. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a single genicular nerve block of the index knee 6. Pain on NRS = 6 on an 11-point scale for the index knee 7. Radiologic confirmation of arthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of Osteoarthritis (OA) grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee 8. An intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection is indicated as an appropriate treatment option 9. WOMAC Knee Score group at baseline of Score of = 2 (0 to 4 scale) on WOMAC question 1 (Pain) and a mean score of = 1.5 on all five questions of the WOMAC pain subscale. 10. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin/gabapentin and antidepressants for pain such as Cymbalta/duloxetine must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for = 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of the investigator 11. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for knee pain during the study period 12. Willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method if of child bearing potential. 13. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for the period of the study follow up 14. Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study EXCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (for example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic inflammatory condition (for example, gout, fibromyalgia) that could cause knee pain 2. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the index knee 3. Previous or pending lower limb amputation 4. Intra-articular steroid injection into the index knee within 90 days from randomization 5. Hyaluronic acid injection, platelet rich plasma (PRP), stem cell, or arthroscopic debridement/lavage injection into the index knee within 180 days from randomization 6. Prior radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves of the index knee 7. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty of the index knee (residual hardware) 8. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee 9. Clinically significant valgus/varus deformities or evidence of pathology (other than osteoarthritis of knee) that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain and/or functional limitations 10. Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2 11. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns 12. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability remuneration (secondary gain) 13. Pregnant, nursing or intent on becoming pregnant during the study period 14. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction 15. Beck's Depression Index score of > 22 (indicates clinically depressed state) 16. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures, including known hypersensitivity (allergy) to hyaluronate preparations or allergies to avian or avian-derived products (including eggs, feathers, or poultry) 17. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved) 18. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable. 19. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol 20. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse 21. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 60 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose 22. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.) 23. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator. 24. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent 25. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University Orthopedics Center | Altoona | Pennsylvania |
United States | Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management | Anderson | South Carolina |
United States | University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | Lyman Medical Research | Coeur d'Alene | Idaho |
United States | Clinical Investigations, LLC | Edmond | Oklahoma |
United States | Ocshner Baptist Clinical Trials Unit | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Virginia iSpine Physicians | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota |
United States | University Orthopedics Center | State College | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Avanos Medical |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | EQ-5D-5L | The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 6 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. | Baseline to 6 month study visit | |
Other | EQ-5D-5L | The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 12 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. | Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit | |
Other | Global Perceived Effect | Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported. | Baseline to 6 month study visit | |
Other | Global Perceived Effect | Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported. | Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit | |
Other | Numeric Rating Scale | The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by = 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales. | Baseline to 18 month study visit | |
Other | Numeric Rating Scale | The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by = 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales. | Baseline to 24 month study visit | |
Other | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 18 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study subject condition) and 96 (worst study subject condition). | Baseline to 18 month study visit | |
Other | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 24 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study subject condition) and 96 (worst study subject condition). | Baseline to 24 month study visit | |
Other | EQ-5D-5L | The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 18 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. | Baseline to 18 month study visit | |
Other | EQ-5D-5L | The change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline to 24 months. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with "1" indicating the best study subject condition and "5" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. | Baseline to 24 month study visit | |
Other | Global Perceived Effect | Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported. | Baseline to 18 month study visit | |
Other | Global Perceived Effect | Number of participants with improvement measured by the Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever". There are no sub-scales. Number of participants scoring at either 5, 6, or 7 points on the Global Perceived Effect scale are reported. | Baseline to 24 month study visit | |
Other | Safety: The Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Between 12 - 24 Months (Extension) | Safety: The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events between 12 - 24 months (Extension) | 12 month study visit to 24 month study visit | |
Primary | Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by = 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales. | Baseline to 6 month study visit | |
Primary | Safety: The Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up. | Safety: The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up. | Baseline to 12 month study visit | |
Secondary | Numeric Rating Scale | The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by = 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain". There are no sub-scales. | Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit | |
Secondary | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 6 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study subject condition) and 96 (worst study subject condition). | Baseline to 6 month study visit | |
Secondary | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | The change in WOMAC score from baseline to 12 months. This outcome instrument is composed of three sub-scales, including "Pain" (5 questions), "Stiffness" (2 questions), and "Physical Function" (17 questions). The point range for each sub-scale question is from 0 to 4, with "0" indicating the best study subject condition and "4" indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum score per sub-scale is 0, and the maximum is 20, 8, and 68 for "Pain", Stiffness", and "Physical Function", respectively. The minimum and maximum possible scores for the entire instrument are 0 (best study subject condition) and 96 (worst study subject condition). | Baseline (or date of crossover for Crossover group subjects) to 12 month study visit |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03277066 -
A 4-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HP-5000 in Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03090698 -
Outcomes of Injections in Patients Waiting for Total Knee Replacement
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02556710 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy & Safety of an Intra-Articular Ampion Injection for Pain of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02237846 -
Clinical Study of Umbilical Cord Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cells (UC-MSC) for Treatment of Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02242435 -
A Multiple Injection Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Ampion in Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02096393 -
Patient Specific Instrumentation in TKR
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01849445 -
Targeted Rehabilitation to Improve Outcome After Knee Replacement- A Physiotherapy Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01704157 -
A Prospective Study Evaluating the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With the Cryo-Touch III Device
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01374230 -
Long-Term Multicenter Evaluation of the E1® Tibial Bearing
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01270412 -
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) as a Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis PRP as a Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01410409 -
Structured Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee With or Without Total Knee Replacement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02156440 -
Cross-over Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SierraSil Joint Formula 14 in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01207115 -
A Study of ABT-652 in Adults With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00970008 -
Exploring Massage Benefits for Arthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01331278 -
A Comparative Study of Knee Systems
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00988091 -
Investigation of 1.2% Sodium Hyaluronate for Treatment of Painful Chronic Osteoarthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00531427 -
Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Subjects w/Mod-sev Osteoarthritis (OA) Chronic Pain of Knee
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00792727 -
HKT-500 in Adult Patients With Osteoarthritis (OA) Knee Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00449696 -
Gel-200 Versus Placebo in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04145011 -
Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain
|
N/A |