Home Rehabilitation Using Interactive Device Versus Inpatient Rehabilitation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis, Knee Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effect of Home-Based Rehabilitation Using Interactive Motion Tracking Device on Function and Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03476148
• Other study ID #: Rehab. Home vs inpatient
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 13, 2018
• Last updated: March 18, 2018
• Start date: March 22, 2018
• Est. completion date: March 21, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: March 2018
• Source: The Catholic University of Korea
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty is very important in terms of range of motion of the knee, muscle power, normal gait, pain control and consequently the patient's satisfaction. Convectional rehabilitation methods in assist of therapist required high demand of resources. Recently, outpatient clinic or tele-communication tool based rehabilitations were investigated and reported equivalent results. However, those methods also required group or one-to-one facing that restricted availability of the exercise.

With development of the motion tracking technology, new device that gives real time feedback with augmented reality images can be used for rehabilitation in home-based setting.

This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes after the rehabilitation by interactive home-based device or conventional inpatient setting.

Description:

The objective of this work is to compare the pain, stiffness, function and satisfaction between groups at 6 months after the total knee arthroplasty.

The investigators hypothesized that the clinical outcomes of rehabilitation by interactive home-based device are not inferior than that by conventional inpatient setting.

The study design is a single-blind non-randomized controlled trial. Patients takes different rehabilitation method but the outcome assessor is blinded. The clinical outcome is compared at preoperative, postoperative 6weeks, 3months. And clinical outcome consists of Range of Motion (ROM), WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index ) score, Knee Society Score, Time-up-go (TUG) test.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: March 21, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 19 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• over 19 year old

• Patients for total knee arthroplasty of one knee

• Patients who can understand and utilize the device

Exclusion Criteria:

• who don't agree with participation of the study

• who can not understand and utilize the device

• Rheumatoid arthritis, Other inflammatory arthritis

• Neuropsychiatric patients

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Arthroplasty
• Osteoarthritis
• Osteoarthritis, Knee
• Rehabilitation

Intervention

Device:
• Home Rehabilitation using Interactive device
Rehabilitation is performed using interactive motion tracking augmented reality device. 6 exercises are included in one-day rehabilitation program. Each exercise is recorded in aspect of compliance, completion.

Other:
• Inpatient Rehabilitation
Patients are given the exercises in the setting of inpatient rehabilitation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The Catholic University of Korea

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index(WOMAC index)		preoperative, postoperative at 6, 12 weeks
Primary	Change in Knee Society Score		preoperative, postoperative at 6, 12 weeks
Primary	Change in Time-Up-Go (TUG) test		preoperative, postoperative at 6, 12 weeks