Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03286868
Other study ID # TKA VERA
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received August 30, 2017
Last updated February 5, 2018
Start date March 2018
Est. completion date January 2020

Study information

Verified date February 2018
Source Nova Scotia Health Authority
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is an operation to help with the pain and decreased function that happens with end stage arthritis of the knee. This operation has been shown to be very successful at relieving pain and improving patient mobility; however, some studies have shown that up to 20% of TKR recipients are not happy with their knee replacement.

All of the reasons why some patients are not pleased with the outcome of surgery are not known, but one of the possible causes is the way the implants are placed, or aligned, during surgery. Most TKRs are aligned in a fashion that the bones in the leg are completely straight after surgery. This is known as mechanically aligning a TKR. A different alignment method known as kinematic alignment respects the natural bow legged or knock kneed alignment of the patient. It is hoped that kinematically aligning a knee replacement will improve how the knee feels to the patient and therefore improve their satisfaction.

Another potential factor affecting the outcomes of TKR is obtaining optimal soft tissue balance. The challenge with balancing a TKR is that traditional operative techniques rely on subjective feel of the knee stability during surgery. The balance or tension in the knee can however be objectively measured using specialized intraoperative pressure sensing devices.

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of kinematically aligned TKR on the pressures measured by Verasense during total knee replacements. The study will also determine if differences in the pressure measured during TKR surgery impact patient outcomes after surgery.


Description:

The primary objective of this research study is to evaluate the use of the Verasense pressure sensor to optimize intraoperative implant pressures/balance during computer assisted TKR utilizing pre- and postoperative kinematic alignment techniques.

This is a randomized controlled trial where 60 patients will undergo a kinematically aligned TKR using VERASENSE pressure sensors. Patients will be randomly assigned to either TKR balancing using VERASENSE data (TKR-V), or TKR using standard surgeon decision making in balancing (TKR only). In the TKR only group, the surgeon will perform the surgery while blinded to the data output of the VERASENSE sensor and will use standard surgeon decision making to balance the TKR. In the second group, TKR-V, the surgeon will not be blinded to the data output of the VERASENSE sensor and will use the data to influence how they balance the TKR.

The primary outcome measure will be postoperative kinematic gait assessment to evaluate the effect of optimizing patient soft tissue balance using Verasense pressure sensor. Secondary outcomes will include the number of intraoperative soft tissue releases, and results of health outcome questionnaires.

Research Questions:

1. What are the differences and similarities between the subjective surgeon-balanced group (standard of care) compared to the objective Verasense-balanced group?

2. Is there a difference in the number of "poorly balanced" knees between the surgeon-balanced kinematically aligned groups compared to the Verasense-balanced kinematically aligned group?

3. Is there an effect of preoperative alignment on ligament balancing using Verasense pressure sensor?

4. Is there a difference in the number of ligament releases required to optimize soft tissue balance between the Verasense pressure sensor aided total knee replacements and those balanced by the surgeon alone?

5. What is the effect of optimizing patient soft tissue balance with Verasenes pressure sensor on gait parameters measured with Knee KG?

ANOVA will be used to examine pre and post-operative differences in specific features of knee kinematics between groups. Primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated using listings and summary statistics. Improvement in pain and function will be analyzed using t-test or Wilcoxon Rank tests.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date January 2020
Est. primary completion date January 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 21 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Symptomatic arthritis of the knee indicating primary total knee arthroplasty

- Between the ages of 21 and 80 inclusive

- Patients willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements and self-evaluations

- Ability to give informed consent

- Varus alignment

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients less than 21 years of age, or 81 years of age and older

- Unable to provide consent

- BMI >45

- Pregnancy

- Patients with inflammatory arthritis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, post high tibial osteotomy, or arthritis due to sepsis will be excluded.

- Active or prior infection

- Medical condition precluding major surgery

- Severe osteoporosis or osteopenia

- Neuromuscular impairment

- Significant co-morbidity affecting ability to ambulate

- Valgus alignment

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Total Knee Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty
Device:
Total Knee Arthroplasty with Verasense sensor
Total Knee Arthroplasty with Verasense sensor

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Nova Scotia Health Authority

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary gait assessment kinematic gait assessment using KneeKG 2 years
Secondary EQ-5D patient reported outcome measure Health status measure 2 years
Secondary Ligament releases Number of ligament releases required during knee replacement Intra-operative
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT04040985 - Legion Primary Safety and Efficacy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04525950 - Robotized Navigation Compared to Conventional Technique in Total Knee Replacement N/A
Recruiting NCT04320914 - High Intensity Laser Therapy (Classes IV) and Ibuprofen Gel Phonophoresis for Treating Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Completed NCT03886142 - Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Radio Frequency for Chronic Knee Arthritis N/A
Terminated NCT04072055 - MOTO Post-marketing Surveillance Study
Not yet recruiting NCT06385275 - The Role of Vitamin K on Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05290818 - Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement N/A
Withdrawn NCT03271229 - Conventional Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Concentrated Bone Marrow Stem Cell Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05992038 - Use of a Putty as Gap Filler in Open-wedge Osteotomy N/A
Recruiting NCT05505552 - Effects of Vitamin K on Lower-extremity Function in Adults With Osteoarthritis: N/A
Recruiting NCT06066684 - Pain Phenotyping in Knee OA: a Pilot Trial
Completed NCT03847324 - Physiotherapy and Therapeutic Education on Patients With Pain Catastrophism Scheduled for a Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT05126485 - Biofeedback Retention in Individuals With AKA Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04956393 - The SOAR (Stop OsteoARthritis) Program Proof-of-Concept Study N/A
Recruiting NCT04541342 - Arthroscopic Evaluation of Cartilage Regeneration After Opening-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy N/A
Completed NCT04391842 - Sustained Acoustic Medicine (SAM) Combined With a Diclofenac Ultrasound Coupling Patch for Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 1
Completed NCT03680807 - Power Production in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis
Completed NCT03783455 - Effectiveness of Five Intraarticular Strategies on Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06264362 - Developing a Nonpharmacological Pain Intervention for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Dementia N/A
Completed NCT05089253 - Effect of Physical Therapy Modalities in Osteoarthritis N/A