Clinical Trials Logo

Osteo Arthritis Knee clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Osteo Arthritis Knee.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • « Prev · Page 3

NCT ID: NCT03559478 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

Sharp Dissection Versus Monopolar Electrocautery in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Under Tourniquet

Start date: November 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study compares the use of sharp dissection with diathermy for the approach to a total knee replacement. Half of the patients will be randomly assigned each intervention.

NCT ID: NCT03502889 Not yet recruiting - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Single Dose Adductor Canal Block vs SPANK Block for TKA

Start date: June 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, randomized control trial to compare SPANK block combined with adductor canal block to adductor canal block alone in treatment of post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome is pain control, which will be measured throughout the post-operative course using morphine equivalents of opioid analgesics used during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain scores recorded at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours post-operatively, cumulative pain score, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and extent of motor blockade. The study will aid in answering the question of whether SPANK block is an effective adjunct in preventing pain and decreasing opioid requirement after TKA.

NCT ID: NCT03286868 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

Balancing Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Replacements During Total Primary Knee Arthroplasty Using Verasense

Start date: March 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is an operation to help with the pain and decreased function that happens with end stage arthritis of the knee. This operation has been shown to be very successful at relieving pain and improving patient mobility; however, some studies have shown that up to 20% of TKR recipients are not happy with their knee replacement. All of the reasons why some patients are not pleased with the outcome of surgery are not known, but one of the possible causes is the way the implants are placed, or aligned, during surgery. Most TKRs are aligned in a fashion that the bones in the leg are completely straight after surgery. This is known as mechanically aligning a TKR. A different alignment method known as kinematic alignment respects the natural bow legged or knock kneed alignment of the patient. It is hoped that kinematically aligning a knee replacement will improve how the knee feels to the patient and therefore improve their satisfaction. Another potential factor affecting the outcomes of TKR is obtaining optimal soft tissue balance. The challenge with balancing a TKR is that traditional operative techniques rely on subjective feel of the knee stability during surgery. The balance or tension in the knee can however be objectively measured using specialized intraoperative pressure sensing devices. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of kinematically aligned TKR on the pressures measured by Verasense during total knee replacements. The study will also determine if differences in the pressure measured during TKR surgery impact patient outcomes after surgery.