Clinical Trials Logo

OSAS clinical trials

View clinical trials related to OSAS.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04030156 Completed - OSAS Clinical Trials

ASSESMENT OF TONSIL VOLUME WITH ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN BOTH CHILDREN AND ADULTS

Start date: February 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The tonsil volume is an important factor in the decision of the tonsillectomy operation. For this reason, it is important to evaluate the tonsil size before the surgery. Ultrasonography was used in a limited number of studies about tonsil tissue assessment and also those studies include only the pediatric population. In this study, we investigate the success of ultrasonography in adults additionally pediatric population as a contribution to literature.

NCT ID: NCT03268473 Completed - Clinical trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment on Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status in OSAS

OSAS
Start date: July 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The main objective of this study is to compare the effect of the non-surgical periodontal treatment on serum and saliva oxidative stress parameters in patients with periodontitis and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and in patients with periodontitis only.

NCT ID: NCT02505620 Completed - Clinical trials for Neurocognitive Function

Neurocognitive Function After Therapy of OSAS

203_14_B
Start date: September 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by repeated episodes of airway obstruction while sleeping. Upper airway obstruction while sleeping leads to a dramatic decrease in oxygen saturation and to hypoxemia finally, in which consequence the patient rapidly awake. Clinical signs are sleepiness and functional cognitive deficits. The Gold standard therapy is "continuous positive airway pressure" ventilation during sleep. However, the success depends strongly to the patient´s compliance. Surgical treatment is an alternative option, which could be considered if clinical success failed. A comparison of the cognitive function of both therapies is not yet analyzed. The study addresses the question which of this treatment options is favorable regarding cognitive function and outcome.