Clinical Trials Logo

Osa Syndrome clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Osa Syndrome.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06326580 Completed - Osa Syndrome Clinical Trials

Clinical Prediction Model of Obstructive Sleep Apnea at Mansoura University Hospitals

Start date: October 20, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)is a sleep breathing disorder manifested by complete apnea or partial hypopnea obstruction of the upper airway, which often remains undiagnosed and untreated (Kuczynski, W., 2019). These episodes, which should be more than 5 per hour and last at least 10 s, can lead to a sleep fragmentation and hypoxia (Huon, L.-K.A., 2017). OSAS predominantly affects 26% of individuals between 30 and 70 years in the U.S (apnea hypopnea index ≥5 events per hour) (Schwartz, M., 2018). Obstructive sleep apnea it is increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiac, neurologic, and perioperative morbidities. Yet this disorder remains undiagnosed in a substantial portion of our population. It is imperative for all physicians to remain vigilant in identifying patients with signs and symptoms consistent with OSA (Park, J. G., 2011). The test of hypothesis is to design a clinical prediction model of obstructive sleep apnea from collected data of the patients having symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea and the results of their sleep study

NCT ID: NCT06119841 Completed - Clinical trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Tonsillectomy and Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty Operations

Start date: January 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background: To compare the efficacy of tonsillectomy and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) in the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Patients with Friedman grade III-IV tonsil hypertrophy and OSA diagnosed with polysomnography were separated into two groups according to the surgery performed, as the classic tonsillectomy group (Group 1) and the ESP group (Group 2). The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) value. The preoperative and postoperative AHI scores and the decreases in these scores were noted. The change in AHI was calculated as a percentage (preoperative AHI - postoperative AHI/ preoperative AHI x 100) and the two groups were compared. An AHI value of <10 events/hour was accepted as cure.

NCT ID: NCT06006520 Completed - Osa Syndrome Clinical Trials

Effects of Exercise on Sleep Quality in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Start date: September 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

the investigators aim in this study is to investigate the effects of aerobic and oropharyngeal exercises on sleep quality in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

NCT ID: NCT04817033 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Sedation Complications in Urology During Spinal Anesthesia With Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam Regarding OSA Risk

Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Light to moderate sedation is recommended during surgery with spinal anesthesia . This study is exploring which sedation drug is better, midazolam or dexmedetomidine for transurethral resection of bladder and prostate in patients with or without high risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Patients were divided in two groups regarding OSA risk, and each group received midazolam or dexmedetomidine for sedation. Investigators observed intraoperative complications of airway and factors that are disturbing surgeon(movement due to participants coughing and restlessness) because one could puncture bladder or prostate and cause perforation.

NCT ID: NCT04681196 Completed - Osa Syndrome Clinical Trials

Nasal Versus Oronasal Mask in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment of Patients Affected by Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

Start date: January 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Nasal and oronasal masks are often used interchangeably and are generally believed to be equally effective; the choice of interface for OSA therapy remains largely based on clinical judgement and patients preference. However, there is increasing evidence that CPAP delivered by an oronasal mask may be less effective, requires more pressure and are worse tolerated than nasal mask. Patients with OSA on oronasal mask are also less adherent to CPAP. Some authors have suggested that in some subjects, the CPAP was not effective when an oronasal mask was used. Moreover when pressures are increased to overcome the obstruction, a paradoxical obstruction may take place. Specific mechanisms explaining upper-airway obstruction events remain unclear and it is not known how many patients exhibit this behavior. This observational retrospective study is designed to compare a group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea with persistent obstructive events using oronasal masks during CPAP, that were fully recovered with the shift to nasal one with the same or also lower pressure, versus a control group of patients who did not report obstruction with oronasal masks. Aim of the study was to find differences in term of clinical, anatomical and physiological characteristics between these two groups.