Clinical Trials Logo

Orthopedic Patients clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Orthopedic Patients.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04981002 Recruiting - Orthopedic Patients Clinical Trials

Telemedicine and Face-to-face Consultations Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison in Orthopedic Patients

Start date: November 5, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Adult patients with acute complaints related to the musculoskeletal system are prevalent and correspond to a large percentage of visits to Emergency Care Units (UPA), often performed by general practitioners. These patients, in most cases, present complaints associated with low-complexity trauma, which can be diagnosed through targeted physical examination and treated with basic guidelines (behavioral/medicinal). The diagnosis of a more complex fracture or injury requires an assessment by an orthopedist. Currently, patients with orthopedic complaints are often seen by telemedicine, but there are no studies that have compared the diagnostic accuracy of remote assessment with standard face-to-face assessment. Telemedicine is a recognized medical care strategy used for various situations, including as a virtual emergency service. Despite the current widespread use, there are few studies that have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of telemedicine compared to face-to-face evaluation, and there are no specific studies in patients with orthopedic symptoms. Scientific evidence of high diagnostic accuracy in telemedicine care can support the investment and expansion of this modality, expanding and facilitating the access of patients to the health service, with a reduction in costs and the rational use of resources. The objective of the study is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of telemedicine-guided self-examination compared to a face-to-face medical evaluation at the UPA in adult patients with orthopedic complaints. Secondary objectives are: evaluation of medical care time, indication of additional tests, guidance, medical prescription, proposed destination after completion of care, cost and patient satisfaction. It is a a randomized, prospective, single-center study carried out in the telemedicine and UPA sectors of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Randomization will be 1:1 and patients will be allocated in the Tele group (evaluation by telemedicine followed by face-to-face evaluation) or in the Standard group (in-person evaluation). The sample calculated for non-inferiority was 50 patients in each group.

NCT ID: NCT03903354 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Postoperative Infection

Intraoperative Hyperglycemia and Infections After Orthopedic Surgery

Start date: January 13, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Postoperative infections are a common complication. A relationship between perioperative severe hyperglycemia and postoperative infections has been found in patients undergoing craniotomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiology of intraoperative severe hyperglycemia (BGC >180 mg/dL; 10 mmol/L) and postoperative infections (wound, urinary and prosthetic joint infection) and to investigate if severe intraoperative hyperglycemia is associated with an higher risk of early postoperative (within the 7th postoperative days) infections (wound, urinary and prosthetic joint infection).

NCT ID: NCT02026427 Completed - Urinary Retention Clinical Trials

Urinary Retention in Orthopedic Patients

UriRet
Start date: August 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The participants were hospitalized in Orthopedic and Traumatology Departments in Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland. The inclusion criteria were (1) age to 40 year-old, (2) no history of urologic problems, and (3) surgery under spinal anesthesia. All the patients where (1) opioids were administered during the surgery, (2) general anesthesia was necessary, and (3) the urinary bladder catheterization was perform during the surgery were excluded from the study. The participants were randomly divided into the study and control groups. No oral premedication was administered. All the patients were asked to empty their urinary bladders before arrival to the operating theatre. When the standard monitoring (continuous electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry) was started, intravenous premedication with midazolam was administered and lumbar spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% solution of bupivacaine hydrochloride was performed. In the study group, but not in the the control one, the 40 mg of drotaverine hydrochloride was administered intramuscularly. The decresed intravascular volume was corrected with cristalloids. During the surgery the adequate, not deeper than II grade according to Ramsay scale, level of sedationt was obtained with midazolam and/or propofol. All the participants received a questionaire in which we asked the questions about (1) the duration of anesthesia, (2) the time of micturition, (3) the time when discomfort or pain appeared in the lower abdomen, (4) the incidence of the urinary bladder catheterization and time to catheterization. On the next day after the surgery the questionaires were collected. In cases, when the patient's dischaged from the hospital was planned during the weekend, he or she was asked to pass on the questionaire to the nurses.