View clinical trials related to Oral Cancer.
Filter by:Phase 1 study to assess the pharmacokinetic availability and safety and tolerability profile of one such ayurvedic preparation which contains 5 mg THC:CBD 1:1 preparation. Other than the PK profile, we will also be studying its effect on gene expression profiling of the breast and head neck oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma tissue.
The purpose of this research study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, topical application of the drug Aldara will have on patients and on their oral cancer. Aldara is a drug that activates toll-like receptor (TLR) in oral cancer cells causing self-destruction of tumor cells. It also activates immune cells to attack and eliminate cancer cells. Aldara is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of skin cancer and melanoma. Its use in this study is 'off-label' (use of a drug approved by FDA for skin cancer to treat oral cancer in this study). The preliminary efficacy of topical imiquimod in a neoadjuvant setting in patients with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma will be determined by a reduction in tumor cellularity in post-treatment tissue compared to pre-treatment tissue. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by CTCAE v5 criteria. The effect of imiquimod on the tumor immune microenvironment will be assessed by performing quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence.
A limited mouth opening (or trismus) after surgery for oral cancers is not only one of the most common complications, but it is also a major contributing factor towards an impaired quality of life after surgery. The enormous impact on the quality of life is secondary to impeded speech, feeding, drinking, and aesthetics. The aim would be to analyse the opening of the mouth before and after surgery, and if applicable after radiotherapy, in a prospective way in oral cancer cases. There is namely a major discrepancy in current science research between the effect of different treatment modalities on trismus, as, in contrast with known research regarding the effect of surgery on trismus, a clear relation between radiotherapy and trismus has already been demonstrated in multiple research articles and systematic reviews. Nevertheless, the clinical experience of this research group supports the need for further investigation on the impact of surgery and the different modalities of surgery on trismus. The investigators are convinced that revealing the surgical factors, linked with trismus, can lead to better prevention and prediction of later trismus for newly diagnosed oral cancer patients.
The purpose of this study is to investigate other drugs that may be combined with radiation to treat cancer. The study focuses on determining whether a combination of durvalumab with radiation can both improve cure rate and at the same time have less serious side effects. Throughout this document, this investigational drug will be referred to as the "study drug", or named individually (durvalumab). The study drug in this research is referred to as investigational because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet approved itfor the treatment of head and neck cancer. Durvalumab was FDA approved in 2017 for the treatment of certain types of bladder cancer, but has not been approved for use in Head and Neck cancer patients. Durvalumab is an experimental drug that uses the body's immune system to fight the cancer. This study drug is being used in other ongoing clinical trials for other types of cancers. The doctor feels that a patient may experience fewer side effects using this study drug with radiation rather than using cisplatin. The doctor is also investigating whether using this drug can increase the effectiveness of treatment.
Participants in this study have a type of cancer called squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Their SCCHN has spread around the area where the cancer first started. This is called locally-advanced SCCHN. These participants are eligible for surgery. Previous research with a similar therapy regimen resulted in high rates of cancer shrinkage, high rates of avoiding radiation and its side effects, high cure rate and good quality of life. Radiation can be very toxic. The purpose on this study is to try to avoid radiation. If the participants are not on this study they would be receiving radiation as it is standard treatment of their cancer. In the last study with a similar regimen, about a third of cancers had a pathologic complete response with the first part of the study. This means that the chemotherapy had killed the cancer. The investigators are trying to improve the regimen further with a goal of increasing this rate of complete response to the first part of therapy. The investigators also hope that by improving results in the first part, that more people will be cured and that long term quality of life (especially speech and swallowing) will be improved, both compared to standard therapies and to the last study. Doctors do not know how this therapy will effect the participants. There is no guarantee that this study will benefit the participants. The prior study used a combination of chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin, paclitaxel and a third targeted anti-cancer drug. In this study the investigators are testing the combination of carboplatin, nano-albumin bound paclitaxel and durvalumab. Nano-albumin bound paclitaxel has been shown to be more active against other types of squamous cancers than regular paclitaxel. It is FDA approved for squamous lung cancer, but experimental for head and neck cancer. Durvalumab is an experimental drug that uses the body's own immune system to fight the cancer. Doctors hope that combining Durvalumab with 2 chemotherapy drugs will be effective in treating SCCHN. Durvalumab on its own has been studied in patients with SCCHN and initial results have shown that some subjects' cancer has responded to it. The purpose of this study is to test a combination of chemotherapy to hopefully both increase the number of subjects that respond to therapy while also decreasing the number of side effects that subjects experience.
In areas of the world where populations are undernourished poor oral health is prevalent. Diets rich in fruit and vegetables are thought to have many health benefits including reducing the risk of oral cancer or gum disease. In particular fruits such as strawberries contain many different compounds which may be responsible for these proposed health benefits. From this study, the researchers hope to gain information about how the tissues in the mouth absorb strawberry gummies in a population of habitually smoking and never smoking men and women. The researchers will measure inflammation hormones in your saliva and urine and the genes in your mouth and blood. Two different strawberry gummies will be tested in this study. The strawberry gummies were developed at OSU in the Department of Food Science and Technology. One type of strawberry gummy will contain freeze-dried whole strawberries while the other type will have no fruit. In total the eight pieces of strawberry gummies that you will consume in one day will be at most equal to 1 cup of whole strawberries. The research team believes the two strawberry gummies may be digested and absorbed differently and that components in the strawberry gummies may be helpful for oral health.
In this study, the investigators want to pre-operatively scan patients who do not have any clinically suspicion of metastases with an 18F-FDG-PET/CT whole body scan , where after they go to lymphoscintigraphy incl. SPECT/CT and sentinel node biopsy. Material from the oral cancer and, after permission of each patient, also normal oral tissue will be analyzed molecular-biologically. Also a blood sample will be analyzed for molecular tumor markers. The investigators want to see if PET/CT is able to detect any signs of sub-clinically metastases. Besides, the investigators want to fusion PET/CT with SPECT/CT data from the lymphoscintigraphy study and improve our PET/CT scanning with a dual-time PET scan of the head-and-neck region.
A feasibility study to compare the test characteristics of three different oral cancer screening techniques performed by trained primary health care workers:1)Unaided Visual Inspection, 2)VelScope Assisted Examination, and 3) Examination after application of Toluidine Blue dye.
There is no consensus on the indication of postoperative radiotherapy for early stages oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with complete pathological resection and no neck node metastasis, but most of the institutions do not give any post-operative treatment. Loco-regional control rates range between 80-85% at five years. Surgical margins molecular analysis for microsatellite instability (MSI) marker could help to select the high-risk patients who should receive postoperative radiotherapy. We expect to include 120 patients in five years and have 60 informative tumors for MSI marker. Patients with positive molecular margins will receive postoperative radiotherapy (50 Gy). Patients with negative molecular margins will not receive radiotherapy.
Cervical nodal metastasis is the single most important prognostic factor in head and neck cancers. Appropriate management of the neck is therefore of paramount importance in the treatment of these cancers. While it is obvious that the positive neck must be treated, controversy has always surrounded the clinically node negative neck with respect to the ideal treatment policy.The situation is difficult with regards to early cancers of the oral cavity (T1/T2). These cancers are usually treated with surgery where excision is through the per-oral route. Elective neck dissection in such a situation is an additional surgical procedure with its associated costs, prolonged hospitalization and may be unnecessary in as high as 80% of patients who finally turn out to be pathologically node negative. Should the neck be electively treated or there be a wait and watch policy? Current practice is that the neck is always addressed whenever there is an increased propensity to cervical metastasis or when patient follow-up is unreliable. There is clearly a need therefore for a large randomized trial that will resolve the issue either way once and for all. Primary Objective: To demonstrate whether elective neck dissection (END) is equal or superior to the wait and watch policy i.e. therapeutic neck dissection (TND) in the management of the clinically No neck in early T1 /T2 cancers of the oral cavity. Secondary Objective: 1. Does Ultrasound examination have any role in the routine initial workup of a node negative patient? 2. How are patients ideally followed up -does sonography have a role or is clinical examination sufficient. 3. Is assessment of tumor thickness by the surgeon at the time of initial surgery accurate -Is there a correlation 4. Identify histological prognostic factors in the primary that may help identify a sub-set of patients at an increased risk for cervical metastasis.