Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT05326477 |
| Other study ID # |
20042007 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Recruiting |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
May 26, 2023 |
| Est. completion date |
June 30, 2028 |
Study information
| Verified date |
February 2024 |
| Source |
Rush University Medical Center |
| Contact |
Bradley M Appelhans, PHD |
| Phone |
312-942-3477 |
| Email |
brad_appelhans[@]rush.edu |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Socioceconomically disadvantaged individuals typically have poor outcomes in behavioral
weight loss interventions, but the reasons for this are unknown. This project will
characterize the mechanisms through which adverse daily experiences and present bias -- a
cognitive adaptation to harsh and unpredictable environments -- account for disparities in
weight loss outcomes.
Description:
Individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES) lose only half as much weight in behavioral
weight loss interventions as those of higher SES. This is a clinically meaningful difference
in outcomes that has been consistently documented. The overarching aim of this project is to
identify the mechanisms that account for SES-related disparities in behavioral weight loss
outcomes, which would enable the development of more effective obesity treatment approaches
for lower SES populations. One potential mechanism is present bias, which is a tendency to
focus on one's immediate needs that may result from exposure to harsh and unpredictable
environments. Present bias is a compelling candidate as a mechanism of SES-related
disparities in weight loss outcomes because it is much more pronounced in lower SES
populations, and it has been linked to obesity risk, maladaptive eating behaviors, and poor
diet quality. A second set of potential mechanisms includes adverse daily experiences such as
stress, cognitive demands, and exposure to tempting foods. Stress and cognitive demands are
more prevalent or severe in the lives of lower SES populations, and can disrupt the executive
functions that are important for adhering to weight control behaviors during obesity
treatment.
This project will allocate equal numbers of subjects of lower and higher SES to a
standard-of-care weight loss intervention. Importantly, the SES groups will be balanced with
respect to ethnic/racial minority status. Weight loss outcomes and adherence to three key
weight control behaviors (dietary lapses, dietary self-monitoring, and physical activity)
will be rigorously measured across six months of follow up. Individual differences in present
bias will be thoroughly assessed at baseline. Ecological momentary assessment will be used to
capture exposure to adverse daily experiences, as well as momentary changes in present bias.
Aim 1 is to test whether present bias accounts for SES-related disparities in behavioral
weight loss outcomes and adherence to key weight control behaviors. Aims 2a and 2b will
characterize the role of adverse daily experiences in SES-related disparities in weight loss
outcomes and adherence to weight control behaviors, both overall and among present-biased
individuals in particular. Aim 3 is to explore the contribution of race to SES-related
disparities in weight loss outcomes, which has been challenging to elucidate in prior studies
due to significant confounding of race and SES at the societal level. The results of this
study could lead to a new understanding of how socioeconomic disadvantage impacts adherence
to behavioral treatment for obesity, and suggest entirely new treatment approaches focused on
mitigating present bias or delivering tailored intervention content during "moments of risk"
for lapses in adherence.