Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer have difficulty eating, as the food pipe becomes obstructed by the cancer. This may impair the ability for the patient to receive appropriate calorie intake, especially during administration of chemotherapy and radiation therapy given prior to surgical resection. A strategy is to place a feeding tube directly in the stomach or in the small bowel to have an access to the patient's gastrointestinal tract during administration of chemo radiation therapy. However, these feeding tubes may lead to adverse events, including dislodgement, infection, the tube may be plugged, etc. If these complications were to happen, patients may have their treatment delayed, may have to come to the emergency department or even be admitted. In some cases, patients may need to have a surgery performed to treat the complication. Most centres in Canada have moved away from placement of these feeding tubes due to the high incidence of complications associated with the feeding tubes placement, and due to the high efficacy from the chemoradiation therapy in shrinking the tumour, allowing for the patient to swallow. In London, the preference from the Medical and Radiation Oncologists was to have these feeding tubes placed to avoid delay in treating the patients. There is therefore significant controversy as to what is the best approach in this patient population. Our goal is to run a feasibility randomized controlled trial studying this question.


Clinical Trial Description

Esophageal cancer is highly lethal. In Ontario in 2020, an estimated 900 patients were diagnosed with esophageal cancer, while 860 died from it. In Canada, the figures are 2400 diagnoses and 2260 deaths. The incidence of esophageal cancer in Canada is projected to increase over time, especially in males who are more likely to be obese and to suffer from reflux disease. Esophageal cancer is the malignancy associated with the highest risk for malnutrition. Before their diagnosis, 80% of all patients with esophageal cancer have over 10-15% unintentional weight loss. Strategies to palliate malnutrition in cancer patients and its consequences on outcomes have been developed. In patient with severe nutritional risk, use of nutritional support for at least 10-14 days has been recommended in a non-surgical, oncology population. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism have recommended preoperatively enteral nutrition for 5-7 days in cancer patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. In addition, dietary counselling and oral nutritional supplement were suggested to prevent weight loss and interruption of radiotherapy on patients undergoing radiation treatments for head/neck or gastrointestinal malignancies. Routine enteral nutrition was not suggested during chemotherapy-only treatments. The type of supplements administered may have an impact on recovery. It was shown that esophageal cancer patients receiving enriched glutamine, fibers and oligosaccharide perioperative enteral supplementation had a shorter systemic inflammatory response syndrome postoperatively and less surgical stress, which could in turn lead to reduced postoperative immunosuppressive conditions. A recent retrospective study from Taiwan did show a slightly improved 4-year overall survival rate and less mucositis on patients supported by enteral feeding tubes with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. However, there is still equipoise in the literature and most centers in Canada have moved away from feeding tubes. At LHSC, feeding tubes were historically placed on every patient during their induction treatment. Efforts are being made to spare patients from unnecessary procedure, but patient selection is variable. Standardization of this practice is needed. A recent retrospective study evaluating the effect of surgical enteral access prior to induction treatment did not show nutritional or perioperative benefit. There was no difference in postoperative complication rates and weight loss was similar. In fact, dysphagia is felt to be significantly relieved after a single cycle of chemotherapy. Percutaneous feeding tubes may not be required on all patients during induction therapy for esophageal cancer. Those feeding tubes are associated with high morbidity. Kidane et al have shown that 39.3% of visits to the ED after an esophagectomy are due to feeding tubes problems (dislodgement, blockage, infection). Of those ED visits for feeding tubes issues, 17% resulted to an admission. Small bowel obstruction is also associated to percutaneous feeding tube placement and selective use has been recommended. Perioperative use of feeding jejunostomy in gastroesophageal cancer has been associate with a complication rate as high as 44%. Given the related-morbidity, guidelines now recommend selective use of feeding tubes on high-risk patients after esophagectomy. When patients undergoing chemotherapy present to the emergency department with fever or infectious signs, data from the Ontario Cancer Registry show that 46% are admitted, increasing healthcare burden. At baseline, patients undergoing chemotherapy are at high risk of presenting to the emergency department or having unplanned visit to the cancer center, this figure going as high as 49% within 4 weeks of initiation of chemotherapy in comparable jurisdictions. Efforts must be made to save an already strained system. According to the 2020 Surgical Quality Indicator Report Summary from OH-CCO, our center has the worst 30-day unplanned ED visit rate (45%, provincial mean 27%) after esophagectomy in the province of Ontario. Anecdotally, it is felt that most of those cases are related to feeding tubes complications. If these patients present to the ED due to feeding tubes concerns after an esophagectomy, it is likely they would have presented during induction treatment if they had a tube. Alternative to feeding tubes exist (home IV hydration) which could become a less invasive and more interesting solution. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial evaluating unplanned visit to the ED or the outpatient clinic in patients eligible for trimodality for esophageal cancer during their induction treatment, randomized into receiving percutaneous enteral access for nutritional support versus not. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05314946
Study type Interventional
Source Lawson Health Research Institute
Contact Deb Lewis
Phone 5196858500
Email deb.lewis@lhsc.on.ca
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date November 1, 2022
Completion date December 31, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06006390 - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT01624090 - Mithramycin for Lung, Esophagus, and Other Chest Cancers Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05787522 - Efficacy and Safety of AI-assisted Radiotherapy Contouring Software for Thoracic Organs at Risk
Not yet recruiting NCT05542680 - Study on the Design and Application of Special Semi Recumbent Cushion for Postoperative Patients With Esophageal Cancer N/A
Completed NCT03384511 - The Use of 18F-ALF-NOTA-PRGD2 PET/CT Scan to Predict the Efficacy and Adverse Events of Apatinib in Malignancies. Phase 4
Completed NCT00003864 - Docetaxel Plus Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05491616 - Nivolumab During Active Surveillance After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer: SANO-3 Study Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04383210 - Study of Seribantumab in Adult Patients With NRG1 Gene Fusion Positive Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT00199849 - NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine Phase 1
Completed NCT03756597 - PAN-study: Pan-Cancer Early Detection Study (PAN)
Completed NCT00400114 - Sutent Following Chemotherapy, Radiation and Surgery For Resectable Esophageal Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT03652077 - A Safety and Tolerability Study of INCAGN02390 in Select Advanced Malignancies Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04615806 - The Value of Lymph Node Dissection of Indocyanine Green-guided Near-infrared Fluorescent Imaging in Esophagectomy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04566367 - Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) for Detection of Secondary Head and Neck Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03962179 - Feasibility and Efficacy of a Combination of a SEMS and Vacuum Wound Treatment (VACStent) N/A
Terminated NCT01446874 - Prevention of Post-operative Pneumonia (POPP) Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03468634 - Raman Probe for In-vivo Diagnostics (During Oesophageal) Endoscopy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02869217 - Study of TBI-1301 (NY-ESO-1 Specific TCR Gene Transduced Autologous T Lymphocytes) in Patients With Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT02810652 - Perioperative Geriatrics Intervention for Older Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection N/A
Recruiting NCT01404156 - Preoperative Chemotherapy vs. Chemoradiation in Esophageal / GEJ Adenocarcinoma Phase 2/Phase 3