Reducing Tobacco Use Disparities Among Low-Income Adults

Nicotine Dependence Clinical Trial

Official title:

Reducing Tobacco Use Disparities Among Adults In Safety Net Community Health Centers

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03077737
• Other study ID #: 5U54CA203000
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 21, 2017
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: January 2022
• Source: Northwestern University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Most smokers, especially those who are poor, do not receive smoking cessation treatment during their healthcare visits. This study is evaluating a novel population health management intervention for low-income smokers. Automated via an EHR system, which is bidirectionally linked with the Illinois Tobacco Quitline, the intervention comprises a mailed letter and text messaging designed to motivate low-income patients, most of whom are not ready to quit, to accept and use proactive quitline treatment. Increased access to free effective treatment via the integration of healthcare systems and state quitline services may be especially significant in its impact on low-income smokers who are underserved and who carry a much greater burden of tobacco-related disease.

Description:

An estimated 26 million smokers still receive no treatment for their smoking during their primary care visits. Given the persistent clinical system, provider, and patient barriers to addressing smoking in primary care, especially for poor populations, an electronic health record (EHR)-automated population health management approach that directly links the healthcare system with public health services to engage all smokers may increase access to effective treatment. Increased access is especially significant for low-income smokers who are underserved and who carry a disproportionate burden of tobacco-related disease. While 90% of smokers are not ready to quit, many are interested in cutting down, and smoking reduction increases the likelihood of future quit attempts and smoking cessation. Based on self-determination theory, population outreach targeted to low-income smokers that offers them the choice to either quit or cut down as a first step towards cessation may increase their engagement in and utilization of smoking cessation treatment and likelihood of achieving abstinence. This 2-group randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of a population health management intervention for smoking cessation in low-income smokers. Participants will be 530 diverse, low-income smokers of a large Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Chicago identified using its EHR system. Automated via the EHR system, participants will be mailed a letter on behalf of their providers that encourages smoking cessation or smoking reduction as a first step to quitting (Choose to Change; N=265). The letter will be paired with 5 text messages 2-3 days apart that are designed to reinforce the central messaging of the letter ("Choose to change and make your own goal"). All components of the Choose to Change intervention will be offered in English and Spanish. Two weeks after letter mailing and automated electronic referral, participants will receive a call from the Illinois Tobacco Quitline and offered free behavioral counseling and free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; patch, gum, or lozenge) for smoking cessation or reduction. Treatment will continue as either accepted or initiated by participants for 28 weeks. Treatment outcomes will be transmitted directly from the Quitline server to the EHR system. Choose to Change will be compared with Enhanced Usual Care (N=265), in which an electronic referral for proactive Quitline treatment is made during a clinic visit. The primary study outcomes will be treatment engagement (initial counseling call completed) at 6 weeks, utilization (one or more additional counseling calls completed) at 14 weeks, and smoking cessation (bioverified 7-day point-prevalence abstinence) at 28 weeks. An exploratory aim is to examine moderators of intervention effects. An EHR-automated population health management intervention targeted to low-income smokers could reduce critical disparities in treatment access, utilization, and cessation. If determined to be effective, the Choose to Change intervention could be readily disseminated to 11 other FQHCs in Chicago, comprising 85 clinical sites that care for almost 500,000 low-income patients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 190
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women who are 18 years of age or older

2. A patient who receives healthcare at one of the seven Near North Health Service Corporation community health centers in Chicago

3. Daily or weekly cigarette smoker

4. One or more healthcare visits within the past 12 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Language preference other than English or Spanish for their healthcare

2. No telephone number or address listed in the EHR system

3. Lives with another patient who is already enrolled in the study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cigarette Smoking
• Nicotine Dependence
• Tobacco Use Disorder

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Choose to Change
Population-based letter outreach automated via the electronic health record system and text messaging targeted to low-income smokers. Paired with automated electronic referral for proactive quitline treatment (behavioral counseling plus nicotine replacement therapy).
• Enhanced usual care
Enhanced usual care based on Ask, Advise and Refer in which an electronic referral for proactive quitline treatment (behavioral counseling plus nicotine replacement therapy) is made during a clinic visit.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Northwestern University Feingberg School of Medicine, Dept. of Preventive Medicine	Chicago	Illinois

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Northwestern University	Northeastern Illinois University, University of Illinois at Chicago

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (11)

Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jun;87(6):1027-30. — View Citation

Boyle RG, Solberg LI, Fiore MC. Electronic medical records to increase the clinical treatment of tobacco dependence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.014. Review. — View Citation

Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1248:107-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Review. — View Citation

Hughes JR, Carpenter MJ. Does smoking reduction increase future cessation and decrease disease risk? A qualitative review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8(6):739-49. Review. — View Citation

Jamal A, Dube SR, Malarcher AM, Shaw L, Engstrom MC; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tobacco use screening and counseling during physician office visits among adults--National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2005-2009. MMWR Suppl. 2012 Jun 15;61(2):38-45. — View Citation

Landon BE, Grumbach K, Wallace PJ. Integrating public health and primary care systems: potential strategies from an IOM report. JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):461-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.8227. — View Citation

Lindson-Hawley N, Aveyard P, Hughes JR. Gradual reduction vs abrupt cessation as a smoking cessation strategy in smokers who want to quit. JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):91-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6473. — View Citation

Piper ME, Baker TB, Mermelstein R, Collins LM, Fraser DL, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Christiansen BA, Schlam TR, Cook JW, Oguss M, Fiore MC. Recruiting and engaging smokers in treatment in a primary care setting: developing a chronic care model implemented through a modified electronic health record. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Sep;3(3):253-63. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0178-8. — View Citation

Williams GC, McGregor HA, Sharp D, Levesque C, Kouides RW, Ryan RM, Deci EL. Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychol. 2006 Jan;25(1):91-101. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.91. — View Citation

Williams GC, Niemiec CP, Patrick H, Ryan RM, Deci EL. The importance of supporting autonomy and perceived competence in facilitating long-term tobacco abstinence. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Jun;37(3):315-24. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9090-y. Epub 2009 Apr 17. — View Citation

Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Quitline Treatment Engagement	The number of participants who accepted the quitline call and accepted treatment as defined by enrolling in treatment and completing the first counseling session. Participants who returned a quitline call, enrolled in treatment, and completed the first counseling session were also counted as having engaged in treatment.	Week 6
Primary	Quitline Treatment Utilization	The number of participants who completed one or more additional quitline counseling calls.	Week 14
Primary	Smoking Cessation at Week 28 (32 Weeks After Enrollment)	Self-reported seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at week 28. Number of participants who reporting smoking cessation at week 28. Participants were classified as abstinent if they reported not smoking (not even a puff of a cigarette) for at least 7 days prior to the assessment.	Week 28
Secondary	Smoking Cessation at Week 14 (18 Weeks After Enrollment)	Self-reported seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at week 14. Participants were classified as abstinent if they reported not smoking (not even a puff of a cigarette) for at least 7 days prior to the assessment.	Week 14