Analgesic Effects of rTMS in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trial

— TRANSNEP  

Official title:

Long-term Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of the Motor or Prefrontal Cortex in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: a Multicenter Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02010281
• Other study ID #: P120126
• Secondary ID: AOM 120141
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 2014
• Est. completion date: May 11, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: June 2019
• Source: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to evaluate the long term efficacy over 25 weeks of repeated sessions of magnetic transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or prefrontal cortex on average pain intensity, quality of life, sleep, neuropathic symptoms, return to work, in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

The medical device of study: transcranial magnetic stimulator (TMS).

Description:

The present multicenter parallel session randomized placebo controlled study (4 French centers) aims to evaluate the long term efficacy over 25 weeks of repeated sessions of magnetic transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or prefrontal cortex on average pain intensity (primary outcome) and several secondary outcome measures (e.g. quality of life, sleep, neuropathic symptoms, return to work), in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

The patients will be randomized to receive one of 3 treatment arms : rTMS of the motor cortex, rTMS of the prefrontal cortex, or placebo (sham stimulation) of the motor or prefrontal cortex. The study will be double blind, eg the patient and the investigator will not know the nature of treatment. the stimulation protocol will consist of an induction phasse of 5 daily sessions then a maintenance phase of several sessions : 3 sessions a week apart, 3 sessions a fortnight apart, and 3 sessions 3 weeks apart. The statistical analysis will be conducted in the intent to treat population and using a modified ITT analysis excluding all the patients with protocol violation (primary outcome). The per protocol population will also be assessed.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 152
• Est. completion date: May 11, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: August 11, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Peripheral neuropathic pain (unilateral or bilateral) probable or defined according to the criteria proposed in 2008 (Treede et al 2008),

2. Diagnostic DN4 questionnaire score greater than or equal to 4/10 (Bouhassira et al 2005),

3. chronic pain, the average intensity is greater than or equal to 40/100

4. Daily or almost daily pain (at least 4 days out of 7)

5. This pain is present for more than 6 months

6. Patients over 18 and under 75 years old

7. Patients who signed informed consent,

8. Patients whose pain medication is stable for 15 days before inclusion, and will not need to be changed during the study period,

9. Patients who can be monitored during the study period (30 weeks)

10. Patients insured by a health insurance plan or entitled.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Previous treatment using rTMS,

2. Work Accident or dispute

3. rTMS Cons-indications (ECT treatment during the previous month, epilepsy and / or a history of epilepsy; history of head trauma, neurosurgical lesion, intracranial hypertension, metal clip, pacemaker, pregnant or lactating women)

4. Abuse of drugs or psychoactive substances (DSM IV)

5. Central neuropathic pain,

6. Neuropathic pain within the framework of a progressive disease (HIV, cancer, non-stabilized system disease)

7. Neuropathic pain very limited extent, of neuroma type

8. Current major depression or psychosis according to DSM IV criteria,

9. Intermittent pain,

10. Pain for less than six months,

11. Presence of another pain more severe than the one justifying the inclusion

12. Lack of proper filling of self-assessment of pain from baseline and randomization (at least 4 weekly pain scores 7 days) notebooks

13. Lack of stability of pain scores on two successive evaluations, defined as a change of more than 30% between the two assessments of the average pain on the short questionnaire about pain between the first two visits inclusion

14. Subject unable to understand informed consent, under guardianship,

15. Subject who refuses to stop or can not stop prohibited treatment during the study,

16. Patients participating in another research protocol involving a drug within 30 days before enrollment.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Neuralgia
• Neuropathic Pain

Intervention

Device:
• rTMS of prefrontal or motor cortex
description:rTMS of the motor or prefrontal cortex (repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor or prefrontal cortex) assisted with neuronavigation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Pain evaluation and treatement center, CHU Ambroise Paré	Boulogne Billancourt	Hauts-de-Seine

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in average pain intensity from baseline to week 25	Change in average pain intensity from baseline to week 25, average pain intensity corresponds to average pain over the last 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory	each visit for up to 25 weeks
Secondary	change in minimal pain intensity over the last 24 hours from baseline to week 25	change in minimal pain over the last 24 hours on the Brief Pain inventory	each visit for up 25 weeks
Secondary	quality of life assessment	quality of life on the Eurogol questionnaire	each visit up to 25 weeks
Secondary	Proportion of responders to rTMS	Proportion of responders (patients whose pain is improved by at least 30% and 50% compared to their pain before treatment	at the end of treatment (25 weeks)
Secondary	Predictors of the response	Evaluation of predictors of response (nature of neuropathic symptoms, severity of anxiety or depressive symptoms, presence or absence of mechanical allodynia, or dramatization importance of catastrophism related to pain)	Baseline
Secondary	Safety evaluation	Collection of side effects at each session and between sessions of rTMS	each follow up visit for up to 25 weeks
Secondary	Onset of the analgesic effect of rTMS	Determine the onset of the analgesic effect based on patient pain diaries for up to 1 month	one mont afer the beginning of rTMS
Secondary	Return to work	Return to work on a specific questionnaire at the end of the study	25 weeks
Secondary	Maximal pain	Maximal pain over the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory	each visit up to 25 weeks
Secondary	Pain right now	Pain right now immediately after each rtMS session and between sessions for up to 25 weeks	each visit up to 25 weeks
Secondary	Sleep	sleep quality and quantity on MOS sleep	each visit up to 25 weeks
Secondary	Neuropathic symptoms	Neuropathic symptoms on the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory	each visit up to 25 weeks