View clinical trials related to Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.
Filter by:This is an open-label, phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of Nab-paclitaxel Combined With Bevacizumab for unresectable Recurrent or metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.
The main objective of this clinical trial represents the evaluation of efficacy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Cabozantinib in patients with NEN G3 with a proliferation rate of Ki67 20 - 60%.
This is a multicentre, controlled, observational prospective study on new biomarkers, as immune profiling, angiogenetic markers and circRNA from TEPs in the diagnosis and in the evaluation of treatment response in pulmonary and gastro-entero-pancreatic NENs.
there is a need for improving chemotherapy regimen for metastatic G3 NEC of GEP and Unknown origin and this goal may be achieved through more "personalized" chemotherapy regimen.the hypothesis is that mFOLFIRINOX regimen could be a good candidate for challenging the platinum-etoposide regimen in patients with metastatic G3 NEC of GEP or unknown origin. Furthermore, in order to get insights in the putative predictive biomarkers of efficacy of these two regimens, an effort toward a precise molecular characterization of these tumors is required in order to be able to define which subgroup of G3 NEC needs to be treated by which chemotherapy regimen. The FOLFIRINEC trial is set up in order to try to answer these questions
NEONEC is a single-phase, phase II study evaluating the efficacy of the 12-month neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally differentiated digestive NEC. The recommended chemotherapy is based on the current reference combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide (VP16). For anorectal locations, radiochemotherapy is proposed to avoid the morbidity of conventional surgery. The objective of the study is to improve relapse-free survival (RFS) in NEC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiotherapy. In parallel, we will perform a prospective cohort study with patients whose diagnosis is made during surgery, who have not received neoadjuvant treatment, and who are offered an adjuvant treatment of the same type (combination of platinum and platinum salts and etoposide).
The purpose of the study is to understand the extent and degree of somatostatin receptor expression in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas . This may help to make a determination if a radiolabeled somatostatin analog therapy, also referred to as peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT), can be a potential alternative in the future. At this time, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs have not been tested in patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and their efficacy in this disease is not well known Understanding the extent and degree of somatostatin receptor expression is important in order to evaluate the potential of radiolabeled somatostatin analog therapy for treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.
The safety run-in portion of this study is designed to identify the optimal dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors and follows the 3+3 design. The expansion portion will use one-sample binomial designs to assess the efficacy of the combination in patients with refractory NSCLC or NEC. The optimal dose (RP2D) determined in the dose escalation portion of the trial will be used for the expansion portion. The study has been conducted with a dose of 1.7 × 1010 as the recommended phase II dose in an expansion cohort of 10 patients with NSCLC. However, current data suggests that VSV-IFNβ-NIS doses of up to 1.7 × 1011 is safe and likely more efficacious. Thus, this study will test a second VSV-IFNβ-NIS dose level, 1.0x1011 TCID50. A safety assessment will be carried out after 3 patients are enrolled. If this dose schedule is well tolerated and virus PK are not negatively impacted, both the NSCLC and NEC expansion cohorts will open using this dose schedule. If 2 of the first 3 patients or 2 of the first 6 patients experience a DLT, the dose will be de-escalated to 5 x 1010. The safety run-in/dose escalation portion of this study is expected to require a minimum of 3 patients and a maximum of 18 patients (6 patients per dose level). The expansion portion of this study is expected to require a minimum of 10 per cohort. The NSCLC and NEC patients enrolled at the identified optimal dose in the dose escalation cohort would be included in the dose expansion cohort if they are evaluable for the primary endpoint in the expansion portion (4 dose escalation patients at the optimal dose are expected to roll over to the expansion). Therefore, the overall sample size will be a maximum of 40 patients.
This is a randomized phase II non comparative study. Patients with metastatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) Grade 3, will be enrolled in the study and will be randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI or CAPTEM as second line treatment. Disease control rate (DCR) and safety are primary objectives, secondary objectives are Disease control rate (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity of subsequent line of therapy (after Progression Disease PD) with an observational purpose.
Currently, there is no standard second line treatment for patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma. SOX regimen has shown promising in previous study. The study was designed to confirm thet SOX regimen can be used as a second-line regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy with platinum based regimen.
Currently, there is no standard second line treatment for patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma. Irinotecan monotherapy or combination regimen has shown promising in previous study. The study was designed to confirm thet FOLFIRI regimen can be used as a second-line regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy with platinum based regimen.