View clinical trials related to Neuralgia.
Filter by:This study is a single center, placebo-controlled, double blind, randomized, phase II pilot to evaluate the efficacy of erenumab-aooe in the management of trigeminal neuropathic pain comparing erenumab-aooe vs Placebo. A total of 40 patients (20 each arm) aged 18-65 years old of either sex, and any race or ethnicity, presenting trigeminal neuropathic pain will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 parallel, double-blind clinical trial, to receive either Erenumab or placebo. Participants will attend 6 clinic visits (Visit 0-Visit 5) over a period of 21 weeks. Changes in pain intensity and other pain related outcomes of trigeminal neuropathic pain will be assessed. Blood samples will be collected, and participants will need to keep a daily symptom diary and answer some other questionnaires.
Scientific research on pruritus is in intensive development, with significant advances in understanding its pathophysiology. The causes of pruritus are very huge; they can be classified into different categories; we can find dermatological causes, systemic causes, neuropathic or neurological causes, psychogenic or even idiopathic causes. The diagnosis of psychogenic pruritus is often over stated, when no cause is found; therefore, it is important to see what is really relieving from psychic so as not to over-diagnose and adopt a therapy more in line with the real problem of the patient. In daily practice, it seems to have a tendency to separate psychogenic and neurogenic etiologies in the diagnosis of neuropathic or psychogenic pruritus. In the case of patients with psychogenic pruritus and neuropathic pruritus, no study has attempted to study the respective part of psychogenic and neurogenic components. Consequently, it would therefore be interesting to assess the areas of superposition and distinction of neuropathic and psychogenic pruritus. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the psychogenic and neurogenic components of psychogenic pruritus and neuropathic pruritus in order to improve understanding of the mechanism and therefore their management. The main objective of this study is to highlight the differences and the potential common characteristics between psychogenic and neuropathic pruritus in order to improve the differential diagnosis between these two pathologies. The secondary objective of this study is to describe the psychogenic and neurogenic characteristics of psychogenic and neuropathic pruritus.
Neuropathic pain is described as a "pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system". It is thus often a chronic affection, as a difficult-to-treat condition. As such, there is growing proportion of patients with inefficient pain relief. The prevalence of chronic neuropathic pain has been estimated from 6.9 to 10% in the general population and represents a heavy financial burden for the health care systems. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to alleviate severe intractable neuropathic pain (SCS is a reversible treatment option which leads to improve pain relief and quality of life Using conventional SCS, the prerequisite to target any pain relief is to obtain an appropriate coverage of the painful area with induced paresthesia. Despite its effectiveness, conventional SCS has some limitations (Selectivity, Energy consumption …) and in order to address these limitations and challenges, medical devices and neuromodulation industries have developed the Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) stimulation. DRG stimulation appears to be a promising technology that can be proposed to patients with chronic neuropathic pain for several reasons: DRG stimulation has shown promising results in pathologies generating focal pain with more selectively than SCS, lead localization appeared to be less discriminative than SCS. Consequently, DRG seems more stable and efficient to relief pain with lower energy consumption than SCS (therapy can be delivered with very low amplitude compared to SCS). Last but not least, Abbott technology has moved forward to Burst stimulation a couple of years ago and validated this new way of delivering electrical stimulation through several major publications. To our knowledge, applying new waveforms to DRG has not been yet validated. This will represent a fantastic opportunity to refine the design of the next generation of Internal Pulse Generators (IPGs). To date, the baseline study comparing DRG stimulation to SCS is the ACCURATE study. This is a high quality prospective, multicenter, randomized comparative trial conducted in 152 patients implanted with either SCS or DRG stimulation system. Although ACCURATE study is well designed, it has some limitations. To bridge this gap, the investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a crossover design, where SCS and DRG stimulation will be used within patient in three conditions: (i) SCS alone, (ii) DRG stimulation alone (DRGS), (iii) combination of SCS and DRGS (DUAL). Our goal will be to compare SCS vs DRGS vs DUAL therapies in order to establish the superiority of DRG stimulation over SCS in a crossover design, assess the added value of hybrid stimulation (DUAL) over the separate standalone stimulation types, compare the different cortical pathways involved in both techniques, by functional imaging, incl. MRI, analyze energy consumption by optimizing neural targeting. assess the added value of applying Burst on these different targets, after a 3-month follow-up and to reinforce the perception of neurostimulation techniques through the pain community, as the investigators will demonstrate their benefits on pain relief, functional capacity and quality of life, with objectives measures and a randomized design. This study represents a unique opportunity to boost the rationale of SCS/DRGS since each arm of treatment will be blinded for the patient and the implanter.
Phantom and residual limb pain are types of peripheral neuropathic pain that are difficult to treat and where the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex is an increasingly studied technique for the treatment of neuropathic pain and has shown modest effects in pain intensity reduction for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Newer rTMS coils provide the opportunity to stimulate larger brain areas, which could provide a better treatment option compared to conventional coils. The aims of this study are to investigate whether the peripheral nervous system is a necessary driver of phantom limb pain and/or residual limb pain in patients with lower limb amputation using spinal anaesthesia, and to assess the analgesic efficacy of deep H-coil rTMS compared to sham stimulation in the same patients.
This study is being done to test the safety and efficacy of the study drug LY3556050 for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol (H0P-MC-CPMP) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.
People suffering from diabetes often have high blood sugar levels. Over time this can affect many organs including the nerves in hands and feet and can cause a nerve pain called diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP). There are treatments for DNP but in many patients they do not reach a good pain reduction and have unwanted side effects. In this trial, the researchers will look at how BAY1817080 works and how safe it is. They will compare it to a placebo or another treatment for DNP called pregabalin. A placebo looks like a treatment but does not have any medicine in it. The researchers will use a placebo to learn if the participants' results are due to BAY1817080 or if the results could be due to chance. The researchers will also learn more about the right dose of BAY1817080 for these participants. The trial will include participants who have DNP and either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. It will include about 440 men and women who are at least 18 years old. This trial will have 2 parts. In Part 1, the participants will take either BAY1817080 or the placebo. These treatments will be taken as a tablet by mouth twice a day for 8 weeks. In Part 2, participants will take BAY 1817080, pregabalin, or a matching placebo of either treatment. BAY1817080 and a placebo will be taken as a tablet by mouth twice a day for 12 weeks. Pregabalin and a placebo will be taken as a capsule by mouth twice a day for 12 weeks. The participants in Part 1 will visit their trial site 6 times. The participants in Part 2 will visit their trial site 7 times. At these visits, the doctors will ask the participants if they have any health problems, take blood samples, and do a physical exam. They will also ask the participants to complete questionnaires about their pain and other symptoms.
This study will examine whether a form of non-invasive brain stimulation can help reduce pain in people with persistent neuropathic pain.
Assess the efficacy of short-term nicotine transdermal patch administration for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in cancer stable patients or patients in remission.
Preliminary Evaluation of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of XT-150 for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Intrathecally administered, single injection.
Observational registry study assessing the subject's pain history and the impact of surgery for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain by comparing post-operative outcomes (pain level, pain medication usage, quality of life outcomes, and nerve functional outcome) to pre-operative levels.