View clinical trials related to Neoplasm Metastasis.
Filter by:Sarcoma which has spread to the lungs is most often treated with surgery. Even with surgery, most patients will not be cured and will die from their disease, probably because of small cancer cells that are present in the lungs at the time of surgery, but cannot be seen or detected. It is for this reason that we are looking for a better treatment. Giving chemotherapy after surgery is generally not recommended because it has significant side effects and no benefit has been proven. This study is investigating a new technique for delivering chemotherapy directly into the lungs at the time of surgery. Delivering chemotherapy directly to the lungs could potentially kill any microscopic cancer cells that are present in the lungs at the time of surgery, while sparing other major organs in the body from the side effects of chemotherapy. This technique is called In Vivo Lung Perfusion (IVLP). This is a Phase I, non-randomized, dose escalation study that will act as a pilot study for a larger prospective, multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Patients who have bilateral disease will have one lung undergo IVLP and the other lung will remain untreated with the IVLP (the other lung will be treated as current standard of care - either surgery or radiation) as a control lung. The patients will undergo a posterolateral thoracotomy. Lung metastases will be identified by visualization or palpation. After surgical isolation of the lung by proximal control of pulmonary artery and veins, IVLP will be initiated. After 3 hours of IVLP, the lung metastases will be removed in the usual fashion. Patients will be cared for post-surgery according to institutional standards. The patients will be followed for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include additional safety endpoints and efficacy.
Mortality due to non small cell lung cancers is the first cause of cancer death in men around the world. Lung adenocarcinoma regularly induces bone metastases responsible for high morbidity and impaired life quality. Overall survival of these patients is poor. Thus the investigators aimed to identify if some bone and metabolic parameters were associated with overall survival. Patients and Methods POUMOS is a prospective cohort of patients suffering from adenocarcinoma lung cancers with a first bone metastasis (stage IV). All patients have a bone biopsy with molecular status characterization of the tumor for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ALK. Bone metastasis localizations are obtained by bone scintigraphy or FDG-PET/CT. Whole body composition is obtained by DEXA scan (Hologic®). The investigators assessed also fasting blood levels of bone and metabolic biomarkers. Survival analyses will be performed using a proportional hazard regression model.
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is one of the disastrous events when managing advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to a grave prognosis. Although intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy and brain and/or spinal axis irradiation show some effects for LM in advanced NSCLC, the prognosis is still poor with median survival less than 12-14 weeks. Epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed to be effective for LM in selected NSCLC patients in some retrospective research. Our single-center prospective research indicated that the incidence of EGFR sensitive mutations (EGFRm+) in NSCLC-LM patients was high and EGFR-TKIs showed a survival benefit for LM in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients. A multi-center prospective observational biomarker study will be started in 11 lung cancer center based on our single-center prospective research result. The aims of the study are to find predictive biomarkers for LM in advanced NSCLC, to establish EGFR-TKIs based comprehensive treatment for appropriate EGFRm+ LM cases, and to establish effective clinical assessment criteria for NSCLC-LM EGFR-TKIs treatment.
Lymph node metastasis is one of the most common sites to develop disease recurrence or progression after initial local treatment for primary solid malignancies or systemic treatment for advanced metastases. No specific treatment modality has been established as the standard therapy. Systemic therapy is usually considered since lymphadenopathy is considered as a sign of disease dissemination though aggressive local treatment, including surgical lymphoadenectomy or radical radiotherapy might result in long-term survival in selected patients. The concept of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), a high dose of radiation targeted to a pathological entity and delivered in a few fractions, has proven so successful at treating both benign and malignant lesions that it changed the paradigm for radiation therapy. The radiobiology of SABR has been shown to be very favorable for tumor control. Clinical experiences suggested that SABR might offer excellent in-field tumor control with low toxicity profile in selected patients, although the majority of reports are retrospective and include small patients series with heterogeneous tumor sites and dose-fractionation schedules. At present, there is lack of validated prognostic factors to identify the patients who might benefit most from ablative local therapy for metastatic lymph node(s). The mechanism of effect of SABR on the cancer lesions is not yet clear. Apart from its direct effect on clonogenic cancer cells, an immune-mediated process was also hypothesized. Therefore, the present study is aimed to provide a better understanding about utilization of SABR for metastatic lymph node(s). The associated translational researches will also advance our knowledge in the immune system reactions to SABR.
The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnosis accuracy of modified wet suction technique and 5ml dry suction technique on solid occupying lesions.
This is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, superiority study that randomises patients with isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in a 1:1 ratio to receive either perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (experimental arm) or upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone (control arm).
This is a randomized study to determine if not treating planning target volume (PTV) margins during radiation therapy worsens progression free survival rates in patients with brain metastases.
This trail is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of high dose Iconitib combined with SRS for NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation with brain metastases.
This is a multi-center phase III randomized controlled study, designing to access whether the efficacy of EGFR-TKI alone on patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutant type is not inferior to EGFR-TKI concurrent with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), the primary end point is intracranial PFS (iPFS), while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), evaluation of cognitive function, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events.
Rationale: Bone metastases arise in 50% of all patients dying of cancer, increasing up to 70% in patients with breast and prostate cancer. The lesions can cause pain and fractures, leading to diminished quality of life and poorer survival. Current knowledge concerning adequate, personalized treatment of metastatic lesions of the long bones in patients with disseminated cancer is insufficient and inconclusive due to lack of large, prospective series with patient reported outcome measures. One of the debatable issues is the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy. It has become common practise due to professional opinion, but research evidence is lacking. It is thought that adjuvant radiotherapy improves the durability of an implant, prevents progression of the lesion, promotes bone healing, improves limb function, minimises pain and reduces the need for reoperations, however none of these are certain. Moreover, it is a burden on patient's quality of life (e.g. multiple extra hospital visits) causing toxicity and possible side effects (e.g. skin irritation). The true beneficial effect, weighing up the possible pros and certain cons, of adjuvant radiotherapy is thus unknown. Objective: The PORT study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of 'surgery only' compared to surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy as treatment of impending and actual pathological fractures on the pain experienced by patients. Study design: A multicentre, prospective, randomised non-inferiority trial nested within the OPTIMAL study. Study population: All patients with metastases of the long bones undergoing surgery for a(n) (impending) pathologic fracture in the participating centres. Study intervention: One study arm (A) will receive surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy; the other study arm (B) will receive surgery only. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is patient reported pain according to a numeric rating scale (NRS). Clinical functioning, radiological status, complications and survival are secondary endpoints.