View clinical trials related to Neoplasm Metastasis.
Filter by:This is an open-label, dose-ranging study of the vitamin D analog DP001 in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary goals of this 4-week Phase 2A study are to identify an appropriate starting dose of DP001 to be used in subsequent studies in this population and for evaluation of pharmacokinetics of DP001 in ESRD patients.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of CTAP101 Capsules versus placebo in reducing intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) by at least 30% from pretreatment baseline; safety and tolerability of CTAP101 will also be evaluated
The purpose of this study is to evaluate two different dosing regimens of LY2334737 in participants with cancer that is advanced and/or has spread to other parts of the body. Information about side effects will be collected.
Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is a subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) for which there are no existing therapies that alter the disease course. This research will utilize cutting edge functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling technology with the goal of improving walking in individuals with SPMS. The investigators hypothesize that FES cycling will improve walking in subjects with SPMS.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Depocyte® IT combined with the systemic standard treatment in terms of clinical and/or radiological neuromeningeal progression free survival (SSPN)
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a collaborative care intervention to manage cancer-related symptoms and improve health related quality of life in patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinoma.
Metastatic malignant tumors comprise the vast majority of spinal tumors in adults. The most devastating complication of spinal metastatic disease (SMD) is invasion of the spinal canal and compression of the spinal cord or the nerve roots of the cauda equina, resulting in a clinical entity known as cord compression that manifests with progressive loss of motor function and sensation in the legs, as well as bladder and bowel incontinence. The treatment of spinal metastases is mostly palliative with the goals of improving or maintaining neurologic function, achieving local tumor control, and spinal stability. Most patients with spinal metastatic disease are currently treated effectively with radiation therapy and/or surgery with good results. There are however certain limitations in the current treatment of SMD. Radiation therapy has two important limitations: 1) if the targeted SMD is in close proximity the spinal cord, delivery of high radiation doses is contraindicated as it may cause radiation-induced damage to the spinal cord (myelopathy, and 2) there is limit on the cumulative amount of radiation dose, which means that recurrent tumors may not be amenable to repeat radiation therapy. As far spinal surgery is concerned, the main limitation is that some patients are not fit for surgery because of medical co-morbidities. This phase I clinical research trial will test the hypothesis that a new minimally invasive treatment called spinal intra-arterial chemotherapy (SIAC) can be safely applied in patients with SMD.
Early-stage colorectal cancer(CRC)is localized and resectable, but 20% of the patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and 50% of all patients eventually die of the disease. The most frequent site of colorectal metastases is the liver, which accounts for 30% to 60% of cases. In these patients, the extent of liver disease is the main determinant of survival. Hepatectomy is the only potentially curative therapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but when traditional criteria for resectability were used, only 10% of patients were candidates for surgical resection. Although adjuvant systemic therapy after resection of primary colorectal tumors is well established, there are relatively few data on the use of postoperative therapy vs. surgery alone in patients who have undergone resection of liver metastases. In this trial, the absolute increase in the 3-year PFS rate with the addition of FOLFOX4 was a modest but significant 9% in patients who had resection (from 33% to 42%; P = .025). For improving survival in patients with CLM, several studies with biologic agents have been tried. The use of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has resulted in increased response rates in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and improved OS and PFS. In an ongoing phase II trial presented in ASCO 2008, in patients who were potentially curable through resection of liver metastases, perioperative treatment with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) plus bevacizumab yielded an overall response rate of 73% with stable disease in 21% and a mean PFS of 27 months. Response to chemotherapy significantly correlated with a prolonged PFS (P < .001). On the basis of these backgrounds, we designed a phase II study to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with perioperative or postoperative bevacizumab treatment in patients with CLM.
Patients are invited to participate in a research study of liver perfusion (how blood flows to the liver over time). Researchers hope to learn whether perfusion characteristics of liver metastases may be predictive of response to treatment and whether liver perfusion characteristics can be used to follow response to treatment. Patients were selected as a possible participant in this study because they are identified as having liver metastases
Since abdominal wall hernia repair is currently performed with the use of a mesh, side effects associated with the mesh are frequently reported during long term follow-up. These side effects are related to shrinkage of the mesh, adhesions to the bowl, pain, and inflammation of the skin and bowl. To reduce or prevent these effects, a fully resorbing mesh has been developed, which provides sufficient support and strength to allow efficient recovery of the abdominal wall, but also disappear from your body in three years time, so that you no longer have any synthetic material in your body. Previous resorbing meshes also disappeared but over a much shorter period of time, so that the hernia was insufficiently healed, with recurrence as a result. The TIGR™ mesh (the resorbable mesh used in the study) is in principle a synthetic mesh, made of two commonly used polymers, however it will retain 50% of its initial strength after six months. This in theory is enough to provide support of the collagen healing process during the initial wound-healing phase, but also to support the transition of initial collagen to functional collagen. The aim of this study is to compare TIGR™ with large pore mesh used in the repair of the anterior abdominal wall repair (incisional hernia, umbilical hernia, etc..Inguinal hernias are not part of the study). Therefore the patients will be divided into two groups, one group will be treated with a resorbing mesh, the other group will be treated with a permanent mesh. Otherwise there will be no difference in the medication or the surgical techniques used.