Computer Debriefing and Screen-based Simulation

Neonatal Resuscitation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Impact of Computer Debriefing During Screen-based Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03844009
• Other study ID #: RNN
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 7, 2018
• Est. completion date: March 31, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: August 2021
• Source: Ilumens
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Debriefing after simulation plays a crucial role in student learning and medical practice. This paper focuses on impact of computer debriefing technique on knowledge retention of midwives during screen-based simulation of neonatal resuscitation.

Description:

Simulation, including screen-based simulation, is employed in medicine to enhance competency and improve care. It has been practiced for centuries in its primitive form as uses of wax Venus or obstetrics dolls to teaching anatomical knowledge or know-how/gestures. Many benefits come from simulations as the capacity to practiced procedures without any risk to the patient, the possibility of trainees to commit errors and learn from these errors, the repeatability of scenario that can be different or presented to learners many times, and then the opportunity to improved technical and non-technical skills among learners. Specifically, screen-based simulation has many advantages as portability (easy to move), distribution and replicability (usable by many learners at differences places in the world), repeatability (people not faced frequently in their regular practice), even be remotely usable. Screen-based simulation appears in literature to be a complement of mannequin simulation. Indeed, since last years the development of computer science has made it possible to create new kind of simulators in the medical field for the acquisition of knowledge, know-how and technical gestures, more realistic and interactively rich. Debriefing is considered as a part of simulation-based training and cannot be separated of simulators. Debriefing improve professional practice, clinical skills and competences. It exists different debriefing methods: post simulation debriefing, in-simulation debriefing, verbal instructor debriefing, video-assisted instructor debriefing, self-debriefing or also multimedia debriefing. However, debriefing is considered by many as a communication between student/learner and teacher, after a situation (e.g. simulation), and about this experience. It is not just a feedback on performance but also a communication process about the impact of the experience or performance explanation. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a computer integrated debriefing of technical and non-technical skills on retention and performance of neonatal resuscitation management by trainee's midwives. Thirty student in midwifery in fourth year will participate. The study protocol is the following: Baseline knowledge questionnaire, randomization of the participants. Day one: Tutorial of the simulator, First scenario (+/- debriefing depending of the allocation group), second scenario (+/- debriefing depending of the allocation group). Day two (two month later): knowledge questionnaire, tutorial of the simulator, one scenario (+/- debriefing depending of the allocation group).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: March 31, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: February 28, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Student in midwifery in fourth year in france (penultimate year of the midwifery studies)

Exclusion Criteria:

• None

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Computer Simulation
• Neonatal Resuscitation

Intervention

Other:
• Computer integrated debriefing
At the end of each computer-based simulation, the participant had a computer integrated debriefing of his performance during the neonatal resuscitation simulation and a debriefing based on an auto-evaluation of his non-technical skills.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Ilumens, Paris Descartes University	Paris

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ilumens

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (2)

Donoghue A, Nishisaki A, Sutton R, Hales R, Boulet J. Reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for clinical performance during Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation scenarios. Resuscitation. 2010 Mar;81(3):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4. — View Citation

van der Heide PA, van Toledo-Eppinga L, van der Heide M, van der Lee JH. Assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills: a reliable and valid scoring system. Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):212-21. Epub 2006 Sep 20. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	knowledge retention	Knowledge assesment based on a validated questionnaire created from International Liaison Committee On Resuscitation guidelines at T0 (before simulation), T1 (after the first simulation session) and T2 (after the second simulation session, two month later)	two months
Secondary	Non-technical skills assesment	Evaluation of the Anesthetist Non technical skills score at T1 (first session) and T2 (second session, two month later)	two months
Secondary	Technical skills assessment	Evaluation of the Modified Neonatal Resuscitation Program Evaluation score at T1 (first session) and T2 (second session, two month later)	two months