View clinical trials related to Neck Pain.
Filter by:This study evaluates the effect of high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation to the cervical spine on neuropeptide expression as determined by the plasma concentration of oxytocin, neurotensin, orexin A and cortisol; and Examine the effect of HVLAT manipulation on pain perception in symptomatic females with non-specific mechanical cervical spine pain
This is a cluster randomized trial that involves training regions of physical therapy clinics to use pain neuroscience education or continue with usual care. The investigators will examine outcomes for patients with chronic neck or back pain.
This randomized controlled with cross-over trial aims to investigate the efficacy of a cervical pillow (the "Viscospring PostuRite" made by SOFF-ART S.r.l. Via Maestri del Lavoro 49 - 05100 Terni, Italy) versus education in non-specific chronic neck pain. More specifically, effectiveness will be measured using the following outcome measures: pain, disability, sleep quality, cervical pillow satisfaction, and global perception of the treatment effectiveness.
The RAND approach to appropriateness makes it feasible to take the best of what is known from research and apply it—using the expertise of experienced clinicians—over the wide range of patients and presentations seen in real-world clinical practice. The major limitation of the RAND approach, however, is that it still utilizes a limited definition of appropriateness; one that relies heavily on safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Until now the RAND method has not included patient preferences or resource utilization effectiveness. These are both serious absences. In the past decade we have seen an evolution in outcome measures from clinician based objective measures to patient-centered and subjective measures. The development of Patient Based Outcome Assessments (PBOA); Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the recent establishment of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) all contest to the growing importance of the patient's perspective in determining outcomes and therefore also appropriateness. In the Center, we propose to advance appropriateness methods by adding three additional dimensions to the RAND appropriateness methods: patient outcomes, patient preferences and cost
This is a prospective, open label, multicenter feasibility study to evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of BurstDRTM SCS in treating chronic neck pain with or without radiation down to arm/shoulder/upper back
The purpose of this project is to determine the effect of a multimodal non-pharmacological Pain Relief Kit on the pain, functioning, patient satisfaction, and opioid consumption of individuals suffering from an acute pain episode of chronic neck and/or low back pain over a 3-week duration.
The purpose of this study to compare the effect of Biofreeze® versus a Placebo on neck pain, disability, fear avoidance, and range of motion prior to and following cervical manipulation over the course of one week among patients with acute neck pain.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effects of spinal mobilization versus vertebral resonant oscillation (POLD) in patients with bilateral mechanical neck pain on pain sensitivity and neck pain intensity.
The sensorimotor disturbance and postural instability have been demonstrated to be associated with neck pain. Specific therapeutic exercise and manual therapy for the cervical spine are effective interventions for improving dizziness symptoms, neck impairments, functional ability and quality of life. However, the effects of these interventions on the actual impairment of joint position sense and balance remain uncertain. Adaptive changes in the sensorimotor and postural control systems may need to be specifically addressed.
The goal of is this study is to investigate the reliability and validity of a classification system for neck pain patients. In a previous study clinical experts were asked about the clinical criteria they considered to be determinative for 5 predefined dysfunction patterns in patients with neck problems: 1) articular, 2) myofascial, 3) neural, 4) central, and 5) sensorimotor control dysfunction pattern. This Delphi survey revealed a list of pertinent anamnestic and clinical criteria per dysfunction pattern. In the present study we will collect anamnestic and clinical data of 200 neck pain patients. This will be obtained by approximately 20 clinicians that fill out a standardized registration form at the intake of their patients with neck pain. The therapists and patients will receive an informed consent that clarifies the purpose of the study and what happens next with the collected data. Per patient the therapist indicates the dominant clinical pattern based on his/her experience. Prior to the data analysis, the researchers will be blinded to the patient identification data. Subsequent, the registration forms will be screened for the presence of clinical criteria (obtained from previous Delphi study), independent of the therapist's diagnosis/conclusions. A second independent researcher will gather this information, which will be used for statistical analysis, in order to investigate which clinical criteria can be considered as determinative for a particular pattern. Outcome measures for these analysis are: - sensitivity and classification specificity - (positive and negative) likelihood ratios - odds ratios - diagnostic accuracy